Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
Yuk.man Contaminates Food
Answers
I think that a majority know of someone who has/had a mental illness and would want them to get the help and treatment they deserve and need. Thankfully not all of those with such an illness strive to hurt others. My sympathies will always be first and foremost with the victims of such acts of depravity.
12:54 Fri 27th Aug 2021
// contaminating supermarket food is not rational behaviour//
thank god Andie does not read my posts which means I can repeat up to fifty times....
he is so mad it cant be criminal - has been tried as a defence and rejected.
Tried a lot in arson apparently - they set fires and then wait around. clarly not normal
thank god Andie does not read my posts which means I can repeat up to fifty times....
he is so mad it cant be criminal - has been tried as a defence and rejected.
Tried a lot in arson apparently - they set fires and then wait around. clarly not normal
Spicerack - // It's also a very common expression in the lowly circles I move in. //
I worked with telephone engineers for over forty years, I've probably forgotten more horrible expressions than you know - but it's about time and place when you use these expressions, and when you don't.
// No sympathy because, if he did the things he was reported to have done, he's a disgusting freak. //
But he's probably a mentally ill 'disgusting freak' and does that not attract any compassion in you?
// He had zero sympathy for his prospective victims. //
As I said, contaminating food is not the actions of a rational mind, so I doubt he had any rational concept of the consequences of his actions.
That's what some mental illnesses do - and I think we as a society are required to accept that the dreadfulness of the action should not be bracketed with the unwell mind that carried it out.
I worked with telephone engineers for over forty years, I've probably forgotten more horrible expressions than you know - but it's about time and place when you use these expressions, and when you don't.
// No sympathy because, if he did the things he was reported to have done, he's a disgusting freak. //
But he's probably a mentally ill 'disgusting freak' and does that not attract any compassion in you?
// He had zero sympathy for his prospective victims. //
As I said, contaminating food is not the actions of a rational mind, so I doubt he had any rational concept of the consequences of his actions.
That's what some mental illnesses do - and I think we as a society are required to accept that the dreadfulness of the action should not be bracketed with the unwell mind that carried it out.
I think that a majority know of someone who has/had a mental illness and would want them to get the help and treatment they deserve and need.
Thankfully not all of those with such an illness strive to hurt others.
My sympathies will always be first and foremost with the victims of such acts of depravity.
Thankfully not all of those with such an illness strive to hurt others.
My sympathies will always be first and foremost with the victims of such acts of depravity.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.