Quizzes & Puzzles13 mins ago
Why Do Labour Mp's All Wear Masks In The House Of Commons?
What are they trying to prove, how self righteous they are and how long are they going to continue?
Answers
"General secretary [of the Prospect Union] Mike Clancy said: "It is abundantly clear that large numbers of MPs believe that rules simply don't apply to them..." But the problem Mr Clancy faces is that there are no "rules" concerning the wearing of face coverings in England. There has been a problem throughout the pandemic concerning "rules" (i.e. laws) and...
12:22 Thu 09th Sep 2021
dunno, I ditched mine on 19th July, still see plenty of wallies walking around with them. I have it in my pocket in case some pillock demands I wear one to go in somewhere but that hasn't happened yet. I went into the office yesterday and we were supposed to wear one if walking about, I didn't bother.
"General secretary [of the Prospect Union] Mike Clancy said: "It is abundantly clear that large numbers of MPs believe that rules simply don't apply to them..."
But the problem Mr Clancy faces is that there are no "rules" concerning the wearing of face coverings in England. There has been a problem throughout the pandemic concerning "rules" (i.e. laws) and guidance or advice. When the legislation concerning face coverings was lifted in July that should have been the end of the matter. Those wishing to continue to wear face coverings could continue to do so and those who prefer not to need not. The problem arose because instead of just lifting the legislation (which was done, it was said, to enable people to decide for themselves), the government clouded the issue by saying it "advices and expects" face coverings to be worn in certain circumstances.
In London the issue has become further muddled because Mayor Khan has made it a condition of carriage that face coverings be worn on all TfL services. So you have the ridiculous situation where a passenger can travel by train from the south coast to London Bridge on a crowded train without the need to wear a mask and then board an empty TfL Overground train (from the next platform) and have to put one on. Private hire taxis in London (licenced by TfL) require face coverings and prohibit passengers sitting in the front next to the driver. I took a taxi in Dorset last weekend. Mrs NJ and the couple we were with climbed in the back leaving me to sit next to the driver. I asked if it was OK to do so and she was amazed at my question. "Of course it is my love. How else you gonna get home?" When I explained the situation in London she was perplexed.
It is bad enough the government making a dog's breakfast out of something that should be fairly simple: "You don't need to wear a mask any longer but feel free to do so if you wish". But it really doesn't help when you get people like trade union leaders castigating people for failing to obey rules which do not exist.
But the problem Mr Clancy faces is that there are no "rules" concerning the wearing of face coverings in England. There has been a problem throughout the pandemic concerning "rules" (i.e. laws) and guidance or advice. When the legislation concerning face coverings was lifted in July that should have been the end of the matter. Those wishing to continue to wear face coverings could continue to do so and those who prefer not to need not. The problem arose because instead of just lifting the legislation (which was done, it was said, to enable people to decide for themselves), the government clouded the issue by saying it "advices and expects" face coverings to be worn in certain circumstances.
In London the issue has become further muddled because Mayor Khan has made it a condition of carriage that face coverings be worn on all TfL services. So you have the ridiculous situation where a passenger can travel by train from the south coast to London Bridge on a crowded train without the need to wear a mask and then board an empty TfL Overground train (from the next platform) and have to put one on. Private hire taxis in London (licenced by TfL) require face coverings and prohibit passengers sitting in the front next to the driver. I took a taxi in Dorset last weekend. Mrs NJ and the couple we were with climbed in the back leaving me to sit next to the driver. I asked if it was OK to do so and she was amazed at my question. "Of course it is my love. How else you gonna get home?" When I explained the situation in London she was perplexed.
It is bad enough the government making a dog's breakfast out of something that should be fairly simple: "You don't need to wear a mask any longer but feel free to do so if you wish". But it really doesn't help when you get people like trade union leaders castigating people for failing to obey rules which do not exist.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.