Quizzes & Puzzles18 mins ago
Joanna Lumley Calls For Rationing
https:/ /www.in depende nt.co.u k/arts- enterta inment/ films/n ews/joa nna-lum ley-war time-ra tioning -climat e-chang e-b1945 344.htm l
As I understand it she wants everyone to be given points to spend on things that have a negative effect on the climate - fuel for the car, gas and electricity in the home, flights, meat, new clothes, imported food, imported everything...
Everyone would have a set number of points to spend as they wish for one year, and when they are gone, that's it.
I can see many problems with this - racketeering on the black market being one.
Good idea?
As I understand it she wants everyone to be given points to spend on things that have a negative effect on the climate - fuel for the car, gas and electricity in the home, flights, meat, new clothes, imported food, imported everything...
Everyone would have a set number of points to spend as they wish for one year, and when they are gone, that's it.
I can see many problems with this - racketeering on the black market being one.
Good idea?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by barry1010. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I have a great deal of respect for her for what she did for the gurkhas, but I do not see how this might work. What happens 2/3rds of the way thru the year and you run out of points so you can't get to work or get to care for an elderly relative?Meanwhile the likes of JL and Dame Emma Thompson are jetting round the world and lecturing the rest of us.
//webbo: But that was her JOB//
No it isn't. She's an actor. She need not roam the globe making documentaries for TV. If she was really worried about the effect air travel has on the environment she would have the filming done by local crews and she could voice it over or if this was unsuitable then not made the programmes at all. She's advocating that people adopt "sackcloth and ashes" and return to conditions similar to that experienced in the wake of WW2. Well at that time they didn't have a telly, let alone be able to watch actors strutting about the globe.
Similarly with politicians, there is no need for them to galivant around the world, shaking hands and having agreeable dinners. The "G7" leaders met in Cornwall in the summer, causing havoc in a totally unsuitable location (and as an aside caused a huge spike in Covid cases in that area). The "G20" is meeting in Rome even as I write. The "COP26" begins its month long jamboree on Monday. The President of the USA alone causes his own emissions explosion every time he moves. At least four huge aircraft are involved and his equipment and entourage cause havoc and pollution wherever they go.
These are hypocrites. They pontificate and preach to the "ordinary" people they purport to represent, urging them to adopt all sorts of measures and restrictions that they have no intention of adopting themselves. Personally I don't care what they do, where they go and what they burn in order to get there. But I don't want them telling me that my taking a return flight to Mallorca once a year (which is far more important to me than their endless but pointless jollies) is "destroying the planet" or any other such catchphrase their lackies come up with.
No it isn't. She's an actor. She need not roam the globe making documentaries for TV. If she was really worried about the effect air travel has on the environment she would have the filming done by local crews and she could voice it over or if this was unsuitable then not made the programmes at all. She's advocating that people adopt "sackcloth and ashes" and return to conditions similar to that experienced in the wake of WW2. Well at that time they didn't have a telly, let alone be able to watch actors strutting about the globe.
Similarly with politicians, there is no need for them to galivant around the world, shaking hands and having agreeable dinners. The "G7" leaders met in Cornwall in the summer, causing havoc in a totally unsuitable location (and as an aside caused a huge spike in Covid cases in that area). The "G20" is meeting in Rome even as I write. The "COP26" begins its month long jamboree on Monday. The President of the USA alone causes his own emissions explosion every time he moves. At least four huge aircraft are involved and his equipment and entourage cause havoc and pollution wherever they go.
These are hypocrites. They pontificate and preach to the "ordinary" people they purport to represent, urging them to adopt all sorts of measures and restrictions that they have no intention of adopting themselves. Personally I don't care what they do, where they go and what they burn in order to get there. But I don't want them telling me that my taking a return flight to Mallorca once a year (which is far more important to me than their endless but pointless jollies) is "destroying the planet" or any other such catchphrase their lackies come up with.
I personally don't care who says what about whichever subject is on their mind at any one time. It's a free world and if they feel the need to declare their opinions so be it. Whether anyone acts on the advice of a celebrity is entirely up to the individual, and I for one will make my own mind up about things, rather than listen to someone whose expertise lay in a completely different area.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.