//“These are early estimates, but they do suggest that, overall, Omicron is outcompeting Delta rapidly by evading vaccines to a substantial degree.
“If current trends continue, then Omicron may represent half of UK cases by the end of December.”//
// Dr Nick Davies, one of the researchers, said Omicron was spreading "very fast", was "quite concerning" and was likely to be the dominant form of the virus in England by the end of the year.
The report says the number of people infected is currently doubling every 2.4 days in England. //
And what, out of all that, makes it particularly “deadly”?
//But the true number is likely to be far higher.//
Indeed it is. And the vast majority of those not counted towards the true figure are almost certainly unaware that they have contracted the virus and will get over it without knowing they have had it. This country is now stumbling towards another round of restrictions on its people’s liberties, imposed, salami-style, each imposition only a “little bit” more severe than the previous one, but each one having an increasingly pernicious and cumulative influence. The NHS has had two years to build some resilience against the pandemic taking hold again. Instead of building that resilience it has now fewer overnight beds and fewer IC beds than it had at the start. So once again the treatment of other illnesses, the economy and children’s education are all in jeopardy when there is scant evidence that the new variant will cause any greater problems than the earlier versions. And once again people’s basic liberties remain subject to the whims of ministers and their advisors, liable to be withdrawn at a moment’s notice whenever somebody thinks that something might upset the ability of the NHS to cope. Again, restrictions on people’s fundamental freedoms are being imposed and threatened in order to control demand on the country’s health service, which is blatantly unfit for purpose.
And what of the measures themselves? Many of them are illogical and will have no influence on the spread of the virus whatsoever. I am often told I would do well to heed the advice of “experts”. So perhaps somebody can help me with this: one of the measures - presumably devised by experts - is that people should once again work from home where possible and not work in an office. But you can go to a pub or a restaurant unhindered. One of my relatives has been told to work from home from tomorrow. However, they have an office Christmas bash organised for midweek, meeting in a pub before going on to a restaurant. So they can spend four or five hours together socialising, but the same people cannot spend the day working in a socially distanced office before doing so. If you have a logical explanation for that, try this: If I go into a pub I can spend four hours in there amongst a number of people, no mask required. If I pop next door to the empty newsagents to get my paper, I have to mask up. Am I expected to give credibility to this utter nonsense?