Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
More Barefaced Lies From Boris
49 Answers
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/u k-polit ics-601 43279
Despite categorically denying that he was involved there are emails that show he has lied again
So did Mrs Prime Minister make her husband save the fluffy wuffy doggies before interpreters and other personnel who helped coalition forces during their time in Afghanistan ?
Who actually believes a single word this clown says any more ?
He has lied so often and for so long he has probably lost all sense of reality and truth and untruths blur into one in Borisworld
Despite categorically denying that he was involved there are emails that show he has lied again
So did Mrs Prime Minister make her husband save the fluffy wuffy doggies before interpreters and other personnel who helped coalition forces during their time in Afghanistan ?
Who actually believes a single word this clown says any more ?
He has lied so often and for so long he has probably lost all sense of reality and truth and untruths blur into one in Borisworld
Answers
"We appreciate it was a frenetic time for those officials dealing with this situation." So frenetic in fact that not once did it cross the minds of the well- educated people that maybe moving a load of stray dogs out and leaving loyal workers to their fate would be seen as a bad idea compounded by lies and evasions a la Humphrey Appleby. Only now that evidence is...
17:56 Fri 28th Jan 2022
Naomi, referring to anti-Johnson posts as a 'witch-hunt' is, to put it bluntly, silly.
There's no such thing as witches; they were invented to give people somebody to enjoy persecuting and someone to blame for anything untoward that happened.
There is such a thing as lying politicians, and calling them out is not irrational, in fact it's a duty.
Playing the 'witch-hunt' card is reprehensible.
There's no such thing as witches; they were invented to give people somebody to enjoy persecuting and someone to blame for anything untoward that happened.
There is such a thing as lying politicians, and calling them out is not irrational, in fact it's a duty.
Playing the 'witch-hunt' card is reprehensible.
andres
I think it was Carrie rather than Boris who helped in the airlift of the animals from Afghanistan.
——-
That is what I pointed out in my post at 20.05
andres
I don't think Boris had much to do with this airlift.
You mean other than clearing it on Carrie’s instructions then lying about having done so as the emails prove ?
Righto ! Lol
I think it was Carrie rather than Boris who helped in the airlift of the animals from Afghanistan.
——-
That is what I pointed out in my post at 20.05
andres
I don't think Boris had much to do with this airlift.
You mean other than clearing it on Carrie’s instructions then lying about having done so as the emails prove ?
Righto ! Lol
naomi24
Atheist. I don’t refer to ALL anti-Johnson posts as encouraging a witch hunt …only those that do … like this one. Reprehensible? Yes, it is.
———
Thankfully the mainstream media tend not think that way
They want answers and so do others in regards to his conduct in office
His behaviour and his credibility but yes
The way Boris is treating parliament and the public alike certainly is reprehensible and full of contempt
Atheist. I don’t refer to ALL anti-Johnson posts as encouraging a witch hunt …only those that do … like this one. Reprehensible? Yes, it is.
———
Thankfully the mainstream media tend not think that way
They want answers and so do others in regards to his conduct in office
His behaviour and his credibility but yes
The way Boris is treating parliament and the public alike certainly is reprehensible and full of contempt
"We appreciate it was a frenetic time for those officials dealing with this situation."
So frenetic in fact that not once did it cross the minds of the well-educated people that maybe moving a load of stray dogs out and leaving loyal workers to their fate would be seen as a bad idea compounded by lies and evasions a la Humphrey Appleby.
Only now that evidence is emerging are these civil servants admitting to their parts in the farce, paying lipservice while not resigning in shame at their chicanery.
I know where I'd suggest the empty and insincere apologies could be put but it's a tender area, easily damaged.
So frenetic in fact that not once did it cross the minds of the well-educated people that maybe moving a load of stray dogs out and leaving loyal workers to their fate would be seen as a bad idea compounded by lies and evasions a la Humphrey Appleby.
Only now that evidence is emerging are these civil servants admitting to their parts in the farce, paying lipservice while not resigning in shame at their chicanery.
I know where I'd suggest the empty and insincere apologies could be put but it's a tender area, easily damaged.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.