Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe's Daughter
90 Answers
I feel she shouldn’t be paraded in the public eye now, she looks uncomfortable. She is a little girl and should be at school. This could affect her for a long time.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by smurfchops. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Hopkirk, I think you're right. We don’t know the whole story, but she is an educated woman who worked in education specifically in the area of journalism. As I see it, when she arrived in Iran she was already a marked woman so wasn't necessarily arrested for what she was doing at that specific time but for what she had done - or for what they perceived her to have done - previously. Why anyone expects such a corrupt regime to behave in a gracious or even a reasonable fashion is quite beyond me. I hope she has the good sense never to return there.
NAOMI, you posted earlier, "Looking at her employment history I don't think Johnson got befuddled."
He telt a Select Committee in November 2017, "When I look at what Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe was doing, she was simply teaching people journalism as I understand it."
When she was arrested, she had been working for the Thomson Reuters Foundation and they said, after his remarks, she had travelled to Iran in a personal capacity and had not been doing work in Iran.
Sounds to me that the PM was not sure of the facts.
He telt a Select Committee in November 2017, "When I look at what Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe was doing, she was simply teaching people journalism as I understand it."
When she was arrested, she had been working for the Thomson Reuters Foundation and they said, after his remarks, she had travelled to Iran in a personal capacity and had not been doing work in Iran.
Sounds to me that the PM was not sure of the facts.
She's spent six years in captivity in Iran. I'm not surprised she's upset.
Of course, she's grateful to be out, but her point is that she could have been out six years ago and spending those years with her daughter rather than rotting in Iran. What actually changed to allow her out now rather than back then? Answer: the UK government paid what it admitted was a "legitimate" debt, which it could have done years ago.
So she's grateful to be free, but not much grateful to a government that went through five Foreign Secretaries in six years, including the hapless Boris of the FO who really queered her pitch, and finally did what it could have done years ago.
Of course, she's grateful to be out, but her point is that she could have been out six years ago and spending those years with her daughter rather than rotting in Iran. What actually changed to allow her out now rather than back then? Answer: the UK government paid what it admitted was a "legitimate" debt, which it could have done years ago.
So she's grateful to be free, but not much grateful to a government that went through five Foreign Secretaries in six years, including the hapless Boris of the FO who really queered her pitch, and finally did what it could have done years ago.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.