Ttt Continues To Claim He Has Seen No Evidence Of Boris Lying.

[Hymie]

As a service to him, I have for the third time posted the link below.

The clue is in the website name - well worth a read.

https://boris-johnson-lies.com

[ToraToraTora]

Danny: "PP why do you persist in posting gobbledegook when you are quite capable of submitting sensible posts? " - never seen a sensible post from pp

[dannyk13]

I have TTT, on a few occasions.

[dannyk13]

Check this one TTT

https://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/News/Question1792761.html

[ToraToraTora]

that must be an imposter.

[DonkeyHoaty]

I guess everyone warranted an answer from ToraToraTora except the new kid on the block?

The writing is on the wall for Johnson one feels, his own backbench and senior MP’s alike attacking him this week and I guess the rules of parliament change when a PM is under investigation because Blackford openly called him a liar without any censure from Hoyle the Speaker.
Or is it that the accusation can be made if the MP or PM accused of stating falsehoods is not actually in the chamber?

[THECORBYLOON]

Which occasion are you referring to?

[DonkeyHoaty]

THECORBYLOON
If that question is to me I was referring to this:


Blackford was recently removed from parliament for implying Johnson was lying. Are the rules different as a result of the example I gave?

[gulliver1]

10.45, Danny....13
" PP why do you persist in posting gobbledegook"
...Just another pot and kettle post from Danny.

[THECORBYLOON]

DONKEY, the motion that was being debated was regarding specific claims made by the PM in the House and that by doing so, those claims, "appear to amount to misleading the House."

Normally, an MP cannot accuse another Member of misleading the House (lying) but as that was the subject of the debate, the terms were permitted.