ChatterBank0 min ago
Russian Government Murders At Least 10 Shoppers
wounds 40 with missile strike on huge shopping centre in Kremenchuk, central Ukraine
According to the military it was an X-22 (Ukraine designation) missile fired from Tu-22 M3 bombers which took off from Shaylovka airfield in Kirov and released the weapon over Kursk
This is an actual government - member if the UNSC - committing an act of terrorism in full view of the world.
Apparently without shame.
I’m struggling to think of a precedent - before this “special military operation” began
And to boot: a big cyber attack by killnet (Kremlin hackers) on Lithuania today
Would officially designating russia a terrorist state have any practical use?
According to the military it was an X-22 (Ukraine designation) missile fired from Tu-22 M3 bombers which took off from Shaylovka airfield in Kirov and released the weapon over Kursk
This is an actual government - member if the UNSC - committing an act of terrorism in full view of the world.
Apparently without shame.
I’m struggling to think of a precedent - before this “special military operation” began
And to boot: a big cyber attack by killnet (Kremlin hackers) on Lithuania today
Would officially designating russia a terrorist state have any practical use?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ichkeria. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Rather makes a mockery of Russia being on the UNSC.
Bringing Russia under the same designation as Cuba/Syria/N.Korea/Iran is probably not going to be of any immediate "practical use", but it might make a few "dithering" states sit up and take notice of what is really going on.
Forgive my ignorance, Ich, but how far does NATO's remit go?
They act only if a member is attacked. It must be getting close to the point where some pre-emptive action is needed from NATO.
I'm thinking here of the Baltic states where the threat is palpably real.
Bringing Russia under the same designation as Cuba/Syria/N.Korea/Iran is probably not going to be of any immediate "practical use", but it might make a few "dithering" states sit up and take notice of what is really going on.
Forgive my ignorance, Ich, but how far does NATO's remit go?
They act only if a member is attacked. It must be getting close to the point where some pre-emptive action is needed from NATO.
I'm thinking here of the Baltic states where the threat is palpably real.
NATO has repeatedly said Builder that it will not get involved directly but there might come a point where it might feel it had no choice.
However such a point would probably mean Russia had attacked a nato country or maybe resorted to nuclear or chemical attack and I still don’t think that this is likely.
People in Ukraine think, and I agree, that this is not a response to G7 or NATO summits but related to the deployment to Ukraine of HIMARS highly mobile long range rocket systems by the US, UK and Germany.
They said they’d retaliate by attacking “new” targets although hiring civilians is nothing new.
But it’s maybe a new method: more air launched missiles. The Kh-22 is actually an anti ship missile. Russia has apparently run low on more modern weapons and Ukraine doesn’t have any ships so …
However such a point would probably mean Russia had attacked a nato country or maybe resorted to nuclear or chemical attack and I still don’t think that this is likely.
People in Ukraine think, and I agree, that this is not a response to G7 or NATO summits but related to the deployment to Ukraine of HIMARS highly mobile long range rocket systems by the US, UK and Germany.
They said they’d retaliate by attacking “new” targets although hiring civilians is nothing new.
But it’s maybe a new method: more air launched missiles. The Kh-22 is actually an anti ship missile. Russia has apparently run low on more modern weapons and Ukraine doesn’t have any ships so …
Thanks for that, Ich.
So, the "danse macabre" goes on?
I feel desperately concerned for the perimeter states, particularly the Baltics.
So, Russia is effectively holding NATO at bay, leaving it free to carry on in Ukraine. Understandable, but I can't help feeling (uncomfortably) that the time is coming for NATO to widen its remit.
So, the "danse macabre" goes on?
I feel desperately concerned for the perimeter states, particularly the Baltics.
So, Russia is effectively holding NATO at bay, leaving it free to carry on in Ukraine. Understandable, but I can't help feeling (uncomfortably) that the time is coming for NATO to widen its remit.
Military backing is the key.
The first 200 Ukrainian military arrive for training in the UK shortly.
The aim is to train 10,000 every 3 months.
And more heavy weaponry.
The atrocities of the last day or so only stiffen the resolve of the west. The tide ought to turn, tho it’s not guaranteed.
And as places like Kherson are hopefully liberated in the coming weeks god only knows what further war crimes will be uncovered. The stories out of there are already disturbing.
The first 200 Ukrainian military arrive for training in the UK shortly.
The aim is to train 10,000 every 3 months.
And more heavy weaponry.
The atrocities of the last day or so only stiffen the resolve of the west. The tide ought to turn, tho it’s not guaranteed.
And as places like Kherson are hopefully liberated in the coming weeks god only knows what further war crimes will be uncovered. The stories out of there are already disturbing.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.