Quizzes & Puzzles6 mins ago
Johnson ‘Risk To Country’ After K G B Meeting
42 Answers
https:/
Curiouser and curiouser. 2 days after the Salisbury Poisonings too.
Just what WAS he doing going alone, then being vague about the details later?
Curiouser and curiouser. 2 days after the Salisbury Poisonings too.
Just what WAS he doing going alone, then being vague about the details later?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by FatticusInch. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I’m not on any ‘side’.
I do however want to see the country run by anyone who at the very least is generally is deemed competent, trustworthy, honest, up front but crucially transparent.
We need the likes of Tom Tugendhat, Chris Bryant, Tobias Ellwood, Yvette Cooper, Aaron Bell.
Decent politicians who don’t appear to have any hidden agenda, are not in it for what they can get and appear genuine in wanting to serve the public.
Yes, government is difficult but if you’ve chosen that path you must do it to the best of your ability but making sure above all that you remain accountable to that public.
It’s not a lot to ask and has been diabolically lacking but especially so since 2019.
I do however want to see the country run by anyone who at the very least is generally is deemed competent, trustworthy, honest, up front but crucially transparent.
We need the likes of Tom Tugendhat, Chris Bryant, Tobias Ellwood, Yvette Cooper, Aaron Bell.
Decent politicians who don’t appear to have any hidden agenda, are not in it for what they can get and appear genuine in wanting to serve the public.
Yes, government is difficult but if you’ve chosen that path you must do it to the best of your ability but making sure above all that you remain accountable to that public.
It’s not a lot to ask and has been diabolically lacking but especially so since 2019.
Zacs-Master
//Ha ha. A bit rich saying "a risk to the country" after Corbinsky was leader!//
Not sure how many links Corbyn had to wealthy Russians though, maybe you can enlighten us?
On face value it certainly seems that the Tories have more questionable contacts to wealthy Russians than the Labour Party could even dream of!
Furthermore, Corbyn has never been Foreign Secretary but if he had I’d expect him to have been scrutinised over such a meeting and rightly so.
//Ha ha. A bit rich saying "a risk to the country" after Corbinsky was leader!//
Not sure how many links Corbyn had to wealthy Russians though, maybe you can enlighten us?
On face value it certainly seems that the Tories have more questionable contacts to wealthy Russians than the Labour Party could even dream of!
Furthermore, Corbyn has never been Foreign Secretary but if he had I’d expect him to have been scrutinised over such a meeting and rightly so.
Paigntonian
//Journalists and politicians, writers and researchers meet former KGB/SVR bods all the time. What's hard to understand?//
But it obviously becomes a matter of national security when the Foreign Secretary does it in Italy with no security service personnel present and no official record of it.
Please tell me you understand the gravitas of that?
//Journalists and politicians, writers and researchers meet former KGB/SVR bods all the time. What's hard to understand?//
But it obviously becomes a matter of national security when the Foreign Secretary does it in Italy with no security service personnel present and no official record of it.
Please tell me you understand the gravitas of that?
naomi24
//This was how many years ago? What a load of muck-raking rubbish!//
Terrible when parliamentary select committees carry out the job of democracy and accountability that they’re tasked with, isn’t it?
They become suspicious when something looks ‘iffy’ and the participant has gained infamy for being evasive, terribly forgetful and often economical with the truth.
//This was how many years ago? What a load of muck-raking rubbish!//
Terrible when parliamentary select committees carry out the job of democracy and accountability that they’re tasked with, isn’t it?
They become suspicious when something looks ‘iffy’ and the participant has gained infamy for being evasive, terribly forgetful and often economical with the truth.
naomi24
//This isn’t new ‘news’ - it was reported years ago - but it’s been dug up again now because they want him to go immediately. They don’t know what to come up with next so they resort to scraping the barrel.//
It was ‘dug up’ at the select committee hearing, well before events overtook him and he was strongly encouraged to resign.
//This isn’t new ‘news’ - it was reported years ago - but it’s been dug up again now because they want him to go immediately. They don’t know what to come up with next so they resort to scraping the barrel.//
It was ‘dug up’ at the select committee hearing, well before events overtook him and he was strongly encouraged to resign.
Latest Posts
ChatterBank15 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles20 mins ago
Law29 mins ago
ChatterBank30 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.