Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
Illegals Getting To Our Shores
After reading this article,should there be a crackdown on these judges who are doing this? I can recall Cherie Blair allegedly being one of them ?
https:/ /www.te legraph .co.uk/ politic s/2022/ 08/16/m odern-s lavery- law-big gest-lo ophole- migrant s/
https:/
Answers
HRA = Bliars Pension fund. Its quite simple, leave the ECHR and redraw the HRA to ensure we are the beneficiarie s of it not criminals. Illegal immigrants are criminals, and that is by far the vast majority of these able bodied young men.
08:13 Wed 17th Aug 2022
Doesn't appear to be as simple as you would have us believe, YMF. No need to read the whole piece (interesting though it is) just scroll down to about 2/3 of the way down - 'Can a state leave the ECHR'.
https:/ /ukande u.ac.uk /explai ners/th e-europ ean-con vention -on-hum an-righ ts/
https:/
Bobbisox1
Yep, a 1000 Albanians out of 19,000 still isn’t 40% this week either.
We don’t know anything about any of the cases of these 19,000. We don’t know if Iranians and Syrians are treated any differently than Albanians. Why are you suddenly fixating on Albanians, and were are you getting your information from that their cases are different.
The modern Slavery Act 2015 is aimed at the traffickers, not the migrants.
Yep, a 1000 Albanians out of 19,000 still isn’t 40% this week either.
We don’t know anything about any of the cases of these 19,000. We don’t know if Iranians and Syrians are treated any differently than Albanians. Why are you suddenly fixating on Albanians, and were are you getting your information from that their cases are different.
The modern Slavery Act 2015 is aimed at the traffickers, not the migrants.
bobbinwales
//I agree ken... the lawyers opposing the home Office/goverment allways seem a step ahead ... and seem to have lots of time and resources to go into great detail and keep funding appeals//
Maybe the government ought to review their HR department and employ those legal eagles instead then?
What’s that saying about paying peanuts….?
//I agree ken... the lawyers opposing the home Office/goverment allways seem a step ahead ... and seem to have lots of time and resources to go into great detail and keep funding appeals//
Maybe the government ought to review their HR department and employ those legal eagles instead then?
What’s that saying about paying peanuts….?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.