Government Minister Sacked

[FatticusInch]

Over misconduct claims.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-63177669

Must be pretty serious if he’s unceremoniously ditched, not even suspended?
Seems to have a bit of previous too?
At least they’ve addressed it immediately, be interesting to see what come out in the wash though.

[Peter Pedant]

It is a rough world out there Itch - and not only in the Ukraine !

[davebro]

join the club!

[FatticusInch]

It wasn’t ‘jokey’ enough if other threads are anything to go by, Gromit.

Should’ve called him a savage, that’s acceptable.

[davebro]

twonk!

[Paigntonian]

If someone new to AB were to read the contributions to this particular thread they'd probably be horrified. Don't believe me? Read all 25 and ask yourself if the responses were reasonable, well-argued or illuminating.

[THECORBYLOON]

GROMIT, there are sixteen Mods and only seven of them are public or have a second name.

If one of them deleted it, you'd need to allow time for him or her to read the thread again and see your query.

If they didn't, there will be no explanation.

[FatticusInch]

Oh dear.

[Deskdiary]

Your post was removed Gromit because, without any evidence, you were homophobic and referred to him as a “predatory homosexual”.

[naomi24]

Corby, you’re not up to speed. One of the mods with a second name has reneged on the agreement and said they would not be offering explanations.

[FatticusInch]

Deskdiary
//Your post was removed Gromit because, without any evidence, you were homophobic and referred to him as a “predatory homosexual”.//

He didn’t though.
He asked if in the Whips office they are employing those types, in light of Pincher and the fact that Burns is openly gay.
It seems that when it’s homosexuals who indulge in such acts with other males it isn’t deemed as heinous as if it was a male doing it to a female, that’s certainly the attitude from some ABers.
After all, despite what Pincher did is it right that he is referred to on here as a ‘nonce’ by one particular poster because that is inaccurate to say the least.

[Deskdiary]

You’re wrong Fattichisinch (as per) he did refer to him as a predatory homosexual.

[Peter Pedant]

they'd probably be horrified.
excuse me - two law cases cited MM v NMC 7 Oct 22 - High Court and Hiew v GMC 2005, I think
and quotes from both.
to explain why the innocent fella seems to have had his throat cut before the case heard
oh, and
General Medical Council v BBC [1998] 3 All ER 426, Times 11/6/98, CA - lawful to report GMC proceedings as they took place - unfurled in every prurient detail...

the only reason why they ( a walk in) wd blench is at the length of the reading list I was inviting them to peruse

[FatticusInch]

He didn’t, he asked if they’re employing them in the Whips office but still, let’s try and distract from the main story, eh?

[FatticusInch]

Oh christ, my stalker has turned up at the same time too? What are the odds? Lol.

[Peter Pedant]

the only predatory gropers in parliament are gay - I really dont think so. Straight MPs arent that pure - are they?
Just think
no unwanted sex tonight darling - I was too busy yakking on the Second Reading
Muh-darm, La maitresse, Luli or someone: j'ai pense que tu pourrais lire toujours cheri!

[Gromit]

DD
Both whips were sacked for the same reason. They embarrassed themselves in a bar, witnessed by other Conservative MPs. Their indiscretions where unwanted homosexual advances on other people in a public bar.

No doubt this factual post will also be deleted. Shame censorship is happening under the guise of ‘moderation’.