Donate SIGN UP

Hunt For On-The-Run Asylum Seeker

Avatar Image
fender62 | 18:45 Thu 17th Nov 2022 | News
213 Answers
gobsmacked is not the word, begining of a giant iceberg for the uk, sadly we will become like sweden, and there rape explosion let alone gangsterism, anyone disagree.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11435497/Asylum-seeker-investigation-offence-run-fleeing-police.html
Gravatar

Answers

41 to 60 of 213rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by fender62. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
It's a quote from me.

How many job/home losses are you happy with?
ROY, which folk do you mean?


People who, whether British or foreign, black or white or any colour in between have gone through the correct channels and don't deserve to lose their jobs or homes.

It's not rocket science is it.
ROY, do you have examples of folk who have lost their jobs or homes because of migrants?
//Canary, it's an absolute fact that UK citizens are losing homes and jobs to accommodate migrants,…//

For those in denial, here’s just one to be going on with: (plenty more are available - I’m not finding them for you because I believe what is being alleged):

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/20112269/hotel-sacks-workforce-asylum-seekers/

And a couple which might make you chuckle (bearing in mind the role the RNLI and the Border Farce play in “intercepting” migrant boats):

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/nov/17/border-force-trainees-asylum-seeker-course-home-office

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11383645/Lifeboat-crew-training-course-gets-shown-door-bosses-make-way-asylum-seekers.html

For those who believe this is OK, it is costing the taxpayer £2bn a year. And that’s just for hotel accommodation. It does not include the migrants’ living expenses and support they require. Hotels are cancelling bookings, weddings and other functions. Guests and staff are being evicted. Although they may make a quick buck, some of them will probably never recover. The towns in which they are situated will suffer – hotel guests spend more in the local economy than migrants do. The towns are unlikely to attract many paying guests when it is known that some hotels a full with asylum seekers. Yes, I know – people should not be so prejudicial, but they are and that will only get worse as the problem worsens.

I simply fail to see how anybody in their right mind can defend any of this.
er...

With reference to the hotel dismissing a high percentage of their staff, perhaps they should have negotiated a better deal with the Government to allow them to retain all their staff?
//...perhaps they should have negotiated a better deal with the Government to allow them to retain all their staff?//

You're either being naive or obtuse, corby. These deals the government has concluded do not include catering. Hotels employ quite a lot of catering staff. Many also employ additional staff for weddings and functions. Asylum seekers do not usually hold £100 a head weddings (though I imagine there will soon be calls for them to be able to do so). The government is not going to pay for facilities the migrants will not use. As I have demonstrated (with the Blazing Donkey) it is still costing £500 per week per migrant - and that's quite enough. These establishments will be run more like hostels than hotels and hostels do not require the same level of staffing as hotels.

I take it from your question that you do now accept that hotel staff are losing their jobs and people are being evicted from them?
Corby, I’ve asked this question countless times but no one who, like you, defends the presence of these people in this country has ever answered it so I’ll ask again. Why do you want them here?
Obtuse...I'm going for obtuse.
Vote for the Reform UK Party & stop moaning.
A wasted vote. The public must moan - and loudly. If anything brings this government down it will be this situation.
A wasted vote.


That was no doubt said about voting for UKIP, Naomi.
Question Author
Canary42, as far as im concerned, they are parasites and need removing without recourse to the law, how many are clandestine jihadists or supporters, how many have criminal records, how many need medical attention, how many want demand housing and a stipend ie benefits, oh it's all free money we dont have, guess your not worried about any of the above problems, you must live in a paradise bubble.
And it proved accurate, Roy. If only we could be sure that everyone else would take the plunge … but we know they won’t.
And it proved accurate, Roy.


Really?
You think there would have been a referendum even if UKIP hadn't existed?
No - but when push came to shove they didn’t win a single seat. The electorate stuck to tradition.
those in government should hang their heads in shame, letting this get as far as it has and the judiciary for their part to play in this debacle.
naomi: //..The electorate stuck to tradition.//

Then the electorate got what it deserved, no more, no less.
That’s beside the point, Khandro. When it comes to general elections new parties struggle to make even a dent.

41 to 60 of 213rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Hunt For On-The-Run Asylum Seeker

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.