Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Hunt For On-The-Run Asylum Seeker
gobsmacked is not the word, begining of a giant iceberg for the uk, sadly we will become like sweden, and there rape explosion let alone gangsterism, anyone disagree.
https:/ /www.da ilymail .co.uk/ news/ar ticle-1 1435497 /Asylum -seeker -invest igation -offenc e-run-f leeing- police. html
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by fender62. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.//Canary, it's an absolute fact that UK citizens are losing homes and jobs to accommodate migrants,…//
For those in denial, here’s just one to be going on with: (plenty more are available - I’m not finding them for you because I believe what is being alleged):
https:/ /www.th esun.co .uk/new s/20112 269/hot el-sack s-workf orce-as ylum-se ekers/
And a couple which might make you chuckle (bearing in mind the role the RNLI and the Border Farce play in “intercepting” migrant boats):
https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ politic s/2022/ nov/17/ border- force-t rainees -asylum -seeker -course -home-o ffice
https:/ /www.da ilymail .co.uk/ news/ar ticle-1 1383645 /Lifebo at-crew -traini ng-cour se-gets -shown- door-bo sses-ma ke-way- asylum- seekers .html
For those who believe this is OK, it is costing the taxpayer £2bn a year. And that’s just for hotel accommodation. It does not include the migrants’ living expenses and support they require. Hotels are cancelling bookings, weddings and other functions. Guests and staff are being evicted. Although they may make a quick buck, some of them will probably never recover. The towns in which they are situated will suffer – hotel guests spend more in the local economy than migrants do. The towns are unlikely to attract many paying guests when it is known that some hotels a full with asylum seekers. Yes, I know – people should not be so prejudicial, but they are and that will only get worse as the problem worsens.
I simply fail to see how anybody in their right mind can defend any of this.
For those in denial, here’s just one to be going on with: (plenty more are available - I’m not finding them for you because I believe what is being alleged):
https:/
And a couple which might make you chuckle (bearing in mind the role the RNLI and the Border Farce play in “intercepting” migrant boats):
https:/
https:/
For those who believe this is OK, it is costing the taxpayer £2bn a year. And that’s just for hotel accommodation. It does not include the migrants’ living expenses and support they require. Hotels are cancelling bookings, weddings and other functions. Guests and staff are being evicted. Although they may make a quick buck, some of them will probably never recover. The towns in which they are situated will suffer – hotel guests spend more in the local economy than migrants do. The towns are unlikely to attract many paying guests when it is known that some hotels a full with asylum seekers. Yes, I know – people should not be so prejudicial, but they are and that will only get worse as the problem worsens.
I simply fail to see how anybody in their right mind can defend any of this.
//...perhaps they should have negotiated a better deal with the Government to allow them to retain all their staff?//
You're either being naive or obtuse, corby. These deals the government has concluded do not include catering. Hotels employ quite a lot of catering staff. Many also employ additional staff for weddings and functions. Asylum seekers do not usually hold £100 a head weddings (though I imagine there will soon be calls for them to be able to do so). The government is not going to pay for facilities the migrants will not use. As I have demonstrated (with the Blazing Donkey) it is still costing £500 per week per migrant - and that's quite enough. These establishments will be run more like hostels than hotels and hostels do not require the same level of staffing as hotels.
I take it from your question that you do now accept that hotel staff are losing their jobs and people are being evicted from them?
You're either being naive or obtuse, corby. These deals the government has concluded do not include catering. Hotels employ quite a lot of catering staff. Many also employ additional staff for weddings and functions. Asylum seekers do not usually hold £100 a head weddings (though I imagine there will soon be calls for them to be able to do so). The government is not going to pay for facilities the migrants will not use. As I have demonstrated (with the Blazing Donkey) it is still costing £500 per week per migrant - and that's quite enough. These establishments will be run more like hostels than hotels and hostels do not require the same level of staffing as hotels.
I take it from your question that you do now accept that hotel staff are losing their jobs and people are being evicted from them?
Canary42, as far as im concerned, they are parasites and need removing without recourse to the law, how many are clandestine jihadists or supporters, how many have criminal records, how many need medical attention, how many want demand housing and a stipend ie benefits, oh it's all free money we dont have, guess your not worried about any of the above problems, you must live in a paradise bubble.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.