Donate SIGN UP

Brexit Now Unsalvageable

Avatar Image
Hymie | 09:21 Sat 28th Jan 2023 | News
53 Answers
It’s not me saying that – but the Brexit supporting Torygraph.

How long can the Brexiteers keep on denying the total disaster Brexit is for the UK, when even the Brexit loving media can see the reality of the situation?

Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 53rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Hymie. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Out come those well-worn blinkers again. PMSL.
it makes no sense to say things like "brexit is doomed" or "brexit is unsalvageable" - it has happened, you might as well say crossing the street is doomed shortly after crossing the street.
Question Author
OK, so I missed out the word ‘probably’, such that the actual Torygraph article reads ‘Brexit probably unsalvageable’ – but the sentiment is the same, despite TTT and others trying to discredit the post because I had not read the Torygraph article – but the youtube video explains it perfectly.

I could post innumerable articles on UK businesses that have suffered disastrous consequences as a direct result of Brexit – many going bankrupt. But the Brexiteers don’t care; this is the price of sovereignty.
hymie please explain how something that has happened is "unsalvageable" .
Unsalvageable as there's nothing in need of salvaging.
Don't the remoaners EVER give up on this nonsense criticism of the best move we have achieved of late ?
Judging by the state of the NHS "Which the Con Party are desperate to privatise" .
The £350m per week promised by Johnson after Brexit didn't go there. It was probably diverted to his Cony Club.
"Unsalvageable as there's nothing in need of salvaging.

If a car had to be crushed following a head-on collision with an HGV and there were no components able to removed because the damage was so severe, the car was unsalvageable.
//The £350m per week promised by Johnson after Brexit didn't go there. //

After seven years poor Gulliver still doesn't understand.

Canary, //PMSL//

Oh please! Don't you start wetting yourself!
Which is why there's no comparison.
All that needs sorted now it removing other nations influence over such things as borders, and doing what needs to be done to achieve that. And that isn't Brexit, that's other nations' abuse using Brexit as excuse.
Question Author
Old_Geezer is living on a strange planet, where all other countries must subjugate themselves to whatever rules the UK decides in relation to their borders.

Just how do you propose the achieve that, invade them?
Hymie, what on earth are you talking about? Don’t all countries that aren’t under the thumb of others make their own rules relating to their borders?
Question Author
Old_Geezer // Unsalvageable as there's nothing in need of salvaging.
Don't the remoaners EVER give up on this nonsense criticism of the best move we have achieved of late ?//

Personally I don’t think the UK’s loss of £115 billion in trade with the EU qualifies as the best move we have achieved of late.
I see RBID is still rife among the remoaners.
Sure is TTT.

And as for the 350m the NHS has had more than that,
I won't get too bogged down, Hymie, because this constant repetition is very tiresome. But why do you only concentrate on monetary gain or loss? People voted to leave for all sorts of reasons and as I have said before, the potential gain or loss to the UK economy was very low down on my list of reasons for the way I voted (if indeed it was on my list at all).

There is no doubt that many years ago the EU embarked on a strategy of subjugating its member states by the means of regulating and controlling the way they trade with each other and with the (much) wider world. The carrot was frictionless trading (provided it was accomplished within EU regulations) and the stick was the threat of withdrawing that privilege in the event that a member did not comply with any and all of the non-trade conditions the EU imposed on its members.

This is clearly evident from every one of these posts that you have made. The EU has seen fit to make trading between the UK and its members very cumbersome. That's their privilege. It should not have been at all unexpected and I hope the remaining 27 members are very happy with the arrangement. But it would be nice if you were to acknowledge that trade is used by the EU as a weapon to keep its members in line with all the non-trade philosophies that their Lords & Masters impose upon them.

All that is needed is a UK government which recognises this and stops pretending that, given the will we can get along fine with that despotic regime.
This is getting tedious now,NJ.I thought you were a sensible sort of a guy.Cant you just accept that Brexit is the worst thing that Britain has ever done?Even Margaret Thatcher would turn in her grave thinking about you Brexiteers.I am not just sad,i am angry.
After seven years Poor Naomi still doesn't understand
that BREXIT has done far more damage to the UK and it's economy that ,Thatcher did.
...Oh Please! don't start wetting yourself....
We've been entangled with the EEC/EU for just short of 50 years..do you think it can all be re-arranged in a few months?
looks like this hymie character and the juvenile from lilliput share the same brain cell...they are both obsessed to the extent they need sectioning for their own safety...
ynnafymmi, if you are angry about Brexit then you only really have the remainers who couldn't be bothered to vote to blame for it but now think it is fine to complain about the result. Also the ones who don't live here but feel it's okay to moan about everything to do with the UK even though they have no intention of coming back to live here.

21 to 40 of 53rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Brexit Now Unsalvageable

Answer Question >>

Related Questions