gulliver - // Not many of the dyed in the wool blues disagreeing with me ...
That means they agree with what Sir Keir says .... Good. end of. //
Even allowing for your regular habit of stretching logic beyond its snapping point, that's reaching, even for you.
Assuming that because someone does not contest a point offered means that they must automatically agree with the opposing view is simply not sustainable.
If I read a post that says that 'Jeremy Corbyn was the greatest Prime Minister Britain never had ...' I would not bother posting a rebuttal, because a rebuttal is as obvious as posting that the sun has risen this morning, something so obvious that it absolutely does not need to be stated on here.
On that basis, assuming that no 'dyed in the wool blues' waste their valuable time replying to your tedious one-trick-pony threads on here can be seen as tantamount to tacit agreement with the views of the Leader Of The Opposition, is so nonsensical, that I have already wasted too much of my own valuable time pointing that obvious fact out to you.