ChatterBank2 mins ago
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by piggynose. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
It won't end under the current lack of gun control legislation. The "right to bear arms" should not take precedence over the right to go to school, to go about one's day-to-day business without fear of being indiscriminately murdered by a (I'll be polite) halfwit moron.
Well done to the police on this occasion & my thoughts are with the families of those killed.
Well done to the police on this occasion & my thoughts are with the families of those killed.
surreal in case anyone went - erk- is
20th-century avant-garde movement in art and literature which sought to release the creative potential of the unconscious mind, for example by the irrational juxtaposition of images.
wh even now I think is not applicable
Biden has lost power to the reps so the possibility of further arms limitation is nil.
Furtherly bizarre: police chief stressing that the police ran towards the danger and not away
20th-century avant-garde movement in art and literature which sought to release the creative potential of the unconscious mind, for example by the irrational juxtaposition of images.
wh even now I think is not applicable
Biden has lost power to the reps so the possibility of further arms limitation is nil.
Furtherly bizarre: police chief stressing that the police ran towards the danger and not away
What makes some twisted individuals decide to perpetuate their misery upon others? Some distorted vendetta against real or perceived wrongs that enables them to destroy so many innocents? Malevolently brooding, planning, and committing such heinous atrocities. Abandoning all seeds of goodness, to revel in unmitigated evil. To become the cause of such absolute pain and anguish. They have forsaken their humanity.
-- answer removed --
//It won't end under the current lack of gun control legislation.//
Shooting maybe, but deaths no. The underlying problem of why they want to kill needs to be understood, removing guns will just change the modus operandi. Other countries have guns but this doesnt happen.
Plus, no one on here has ever explained how the USA could remove an estimated 400m guns?
Shooting maybe, but deaths no. The underlying problem of why they want to kill needs to be understood, removing guns will just change the modus operandi. Other countries have guns but this doesnt happen.
Plus, no one on here has ever explained how the USA could remove an estimated 400m guns?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.