ChatterBank1 min ago
Chaos At Dover
Thousands of coach and car passengers endured a miserable Wait .
Many of them all through the night for their much awaited Easter Holiday
Stormy weather and the French were blamed by the UK Government .
But the Brits were just getting a taste of what they signed up for with Brexit When voted to become "Third Country Nationals" in the eyes of the EU... And it can only get worse....You are no longer in the EU so you have to join the non EU queues at ports and airports You voted for it . Enjoy.
Many of them all through the night for their much awaited Easter Holiday
Stormy weather and the French were blamed by the UK Government .
But the Brits were just getting a taste of what they signed up for with Brexit When voted to become "Third Country Nationals" in the eyes of the EU... And it can only get worse....You are no longer in the EU so you have to join the non EU queues at ports and airports You voted for it . Enjoy.
Answers
As I have said before, things are going to get much, much worse with Brexit continuing to wreck havoc on the UK.
09:20 Sun 02nd Apr 2023
You seem to have confused something that changes 5 years max for something that takes a lot longer for change.
For example, if we decided to abolish the Royal Family, would that be voted on the same basis? 52% of voters who could be bothered, and 26% of the population, to end 1000 years of history. Can we change it back 5 years later?
In my golf club, constitutional changes need either 67% of the votes or 50% of the electorate. It gives a bit more constitutional stability ...
And as I like constitutional stability, I am not one of those who would like to reverse what has been done now. That opportunity has passed. But hopefully lessons have been learnt, like they always do ... not!
For example, if we decided to abolish the Royal Family, would that be voted on the same basis? 52% of voters who could be bothered, and 26% of the population, to end 1000 years of history. Can we change it back 5 years later?
In my golf club, constitutional changes need either 67% of the votes or 50% of the electorate. It gives a bit more constitutional stability ...
And as I like constitutional stability, I am not one of those who would like to reverse what has been done now. That opportunity has passed. But hopefully lessons have been learnt, like they always do ... not!
"Can we change it back 5 years later?"
Pretty much.
https:/ /www.rm g.co.uk /storie s/topic s/resto ration
Pretty much.
https:/
Naomi 11 .55 please obey Site Rules and respect other peoples opinions and stop being so rude.