Film, Media & TV0 min ago
Should The Guardian Have Apologised For Cartoon ?
The paper has apologised for a cartoon it published and removed it from its archive, after protests from jewish groups. They say the depiction of Richard Sharp who resigned as BBC Chair is anti semitic.
https:/ /e3.365 dm.com/ 23/04/2 048x115 2/skyne ws-rich ard-sha rp-cart oon_613 7797.pn g?20230 4291536 27
https:/
Answers
I am not a Jew and a lot of anti- Semitism would go over my head unless it was blatant. I did not get the squid reference "Author Dave Rich, an expert in anti- Semitism, said images of squid have often been used to depict the conspiracy theory that 'Jewish forces' have their tentacles wrapped around society and power." I can see no reason for a squid to be in the...
05:16 Mon 01st May 2023
all that cartoonist's work is ugly, Rosetta; I don't like him at all.
However.
I didn't know Sharp was Jewish, and I wouldn't have been any the wiser if I'd seen the cartoon. According to the BBC, the cartoon showed him with "exaggerated feaatures". Well, that's what cartoonists do, all the time. I thought maybe he'd given the figure the sort of huge nose that used to appear in Nazi cartoons; but not at all here.
A far as I can see the only thing that might conceivably be seen as anti-Semitic is the notion that Jews make money and run things, though even that is a nod to success, not to prejudice. The cartoon is plainly anti-Boris but I can see nothing offensive at all in the depiction of Sharp. The Guardian should have stood its ground.
However.
I didn't know Sharp was Jewish, and I wouldn't have been any the wiser if I'd seen the cartoon. According to the BBC, the cartoon showed him with "exaggerated feaatures". Well, that's what cartoonists do, all the time. I thought maybe he'd given the figure the sort of huge nose that used to appear in Nazi cartoons; but not at all here.
A far as I can see the only thing that might conceivably be seen as anti-Semitic is the notion that Jews make money and run things, though even that is a nod to success, not to prejudice. The cartoon is plainly anti-Boris but I can see nothing offensive at all in the depiction of Sharp. The Guardian should have stood its ground.
Nothing to apologise for - political cartoons (especially) are all about 'exaggerated features', usually the more exaggerated the better, going right back to Rowlandson and Gilray.
Evidently, one of the complaints was about him carrying a squid, which is 'a common anti-semitic motif', but that's a new one on me.
Evidently, one of the complaints was about him carrying a squid, which is 'a common anti-semitic motif', but that's a new one on me.
Squid and Jews is an old trope, so I simply cannot believe the inclusion of a squid in the box was a coincidence.
I don’t understand why some on the left, like the paper with its foundations in slavery, have such an issue with Jews.
I kind of get that Abbott is anti-Jew, because she’s a racist anyway, but I don’t understand why Jews rile some on the left.
I don’t understand why some on the left, like the paper with its foundations in slavery, have such an issue with Jews.
I kind of get that Abbott is anti-Jew, because she’s a racist anyway, but I don’t understand why Jews rile some on the left.
Thank you all for your replies, they have enlightening.
I didn’t see any anti semitism but maybe I was a bit blind to it.
I wondered what the squid/octopus was there for, so to learn it is a known trope is disappointing.
Apparently the cartoonist and Sharp were at the same public school together, so perhaps it was a nickname?
I don’t think the actual drawing of Sharp character was anti semitic, I saw it before the complaints and didn’t see a big nosed jew.
The cartoonist has apologised so a bit of mea culpa
I didn’t see any anti semitism but maybe I was a bit blind to it.
I wondered what the squid/octopus was there for, so to learn it is a known trope is disappointing.
Apparently the cartoonist and Sharp were at the same public school together, so perhaps it was a nickname?
I don’t think the actual drawing of Sharp character was anti semitic, I saw it before the complaints and didn’t see a big nosed jew.
The cartoonist has apologised so a bit of mea culpa
"the cartoonist has apologised for it"?...so that makes everything allright?Corbyn has apologised for his anti-semitism,Abbott has apologised for her anti-semitism,the Guardian and Rowson have apologised for their anti-semitism.Perhaps if they werent anti-semitic in the first place they wouldnt have anything to apologise for.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.