Are Gemany's Politicians Finally Getting...
News0 min ago
Huw Edwards
What motivated people who attacked Huw Edwards and the BBC? Were they going after him, or after the BBC? No crime committed. Those who did it must have a reason. Is it an attack on our institutions or on Edwards? I think it's an attack on the BBC first, and Edwards as the means to attack the BBC.
Who benefits from all this?
Who benefits from all this?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Atheist. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
News from about two hours ago if anyone interested.
https:/
https:/
"one wonders how much the sun paid them for their story"
https:/
https:/
ynaff, there is no evidence at all that Huw Edwards is a paedophile. There isn't even a hint. The police can find no evidence of criminal behaviour.
The BBC, like every other huge employer in the public eye, receive complaints about its employees on a regular basis - the majority are malicious, crank or hoax.
An employer cannot know what an employee is going to do and everyone is entitled to a private life. An employer cannot delve in to the private finances to see what their employee is spending money on. In this instance the BBC contacted the family twice for more information and it wasn't forthcoming, the young person would not co-operate.
The young person involved told the Sun the day before publication that nothing untoward had happened yet the Sun decided to publish.
Calling Huw a pervert is stretching things a bit going on the information available. Does everyone believe that only the young and beautiful are paying young men and women for sexualised images and performances on platforms such as Only Fans? I bet many customers are older and even old. Nobody knows for sure whether the young person is male, female, trans or identifies as a three piece suite. There is no evidence that Huw knew the young person was a drug addict. I have given money to homeless people, am I guilty of giving them money for their drug habit?
I have seen many conspiracy theories concerning the Sun's decision to publish on that day, including a cover up or distraction from Boris Johnson's phone messages.
A lot of people haven't forgiven the Sun for their handling of the Hillsborough tragedy. I certainly don't give any credence to their clickbait headlines. When the Sun received that solicitor's letter on behalf of the younger person on Friday they should have decided not to publish.
We all like to think the mature, avuncular presenters on TV are saintly but they are mere mortals. I am not perfect, I don't expect others to be. Thankfully my errors and misjudgments are not headline news.
The BBC, like every other huge employer in the public eye, receive complaints about its employees on a regular basis - the majority are malicious, crank or hoax.
An employer cannot know what an employee is going to do and everyone is entitled to a private life. An employer cannot delve in to the private finances to see what their employee is spending money on. In this instance the BBC contacted the family twice for more information and it wasn't forthcoming, the young person would not co-operate.
The young person involved told the Sun the day before publication that nothing untoward had happened yet the Sun decided to publish.
Calling Huw a pervert is stretching things a bit going on the information available. Does everyone believe that only the young and beautiful are paying young men and women for sexualised images and performances on platforms such as Only Fans? I bet many customers are older and even old. Nobody knows for sure whether the young person is male, female, trans or identifies as a three piece suite. There is no evidence that Huw knew the young person was a drug addict. I have given money to homeless people, am I guilty of giving them money for their drug habit?
I have seen many conspiracy theories concerning the Sun's decision to publish on that day, including a cover up or distraction from Boris Johnson's phone messages.
A lot of people haven't forgiven the Sun for their handling of the Hillsborough tragedy. I certainly don't give any credence to their clickbait headlines. When the Sun received that solicitor's letter on behalf of the younger person on Friday they should have decided not to publish.
We all like to think the mature, avuncular presenters on TV are saintly but they are mere mortals. I am not perfect, I don't expect others to be. Thankfully my errors and misjudgments are not headline news.
