How it Works20 mins ago
J S O Morons Stop Women Getting Baby To Hospital....
24 Answers
https:/ /www.da ilymail .co.uk/ news/ar ticle-1 2322977 /Just-S top-Oil -zealot s-confr onted-p assersb y-eco-g roup-co ntinues -campai gn-slow -marchi ng-stre ets-Lon don.htm l
If it was me with my sick child I'd run straight over them and deal with the consequences later.
If it was me with my sick child I'd run straight over them and deal with the consequences later.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.if I ran them down to save my child would I have a defence under the law of necessity?
https:/ /e-lawr esource s.co.uk /Defenc e-of-Ne cessity .php
https:/
I'd probably do the same, TTT, but that woman never said her baby was sick or that she had to get the baby to hospital. 'My baby is in the car and we have to get to hospital'. She could have been going for her post natal check up or her own ingrowing toenail. We don't know.
But I'm just as fed up of JSO as everyone else.
But I'm just as fed up of JSO as everyone else.
(1)If a person, without lawful authority or excuse, in any way wilfully obstructs the free passage along a highway he is guilty of an offence and liable to a fine not exceeding £50.
(2)A constable may arrest without warrant any person whom he sees committing an offence against this section.
( Legislation.gov.uk. Highways act 1980)
Why are the police ignoring this?
VULCAN, this is relevant,
https:/ /www.in depende nt.co.u k/news/ uk/home -news/p rotest- laws-su preme-c ourt-ar ms-fair -b18726 36.html
https:/
VULCAN, the penalty has changed and can include a gaol sentence and unlimited fine.
"If a person, without lawful authority or excuse, in any way wilfully obstructs the free passage along a highway he is guilty of an offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 51 weeks or a fine or both."
"If a person, without lawful authority or excuse, in any way wilfully obstructs the free passage along a highway he is guilty of an offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 51 weeks or a fine or both."
//if the police are not making arrests, an option which the Supreme court has now given them.//
It must take the full year police recruit training programme to assimilate the new laws. I had thirteen weeks and the perfectly adequate Sec 121 of the Highways act remain with me now. Gawd help them if they had to switch from the larceny Act to the Theft Act and Malicious and Wilful Damage Act to Criminal Law act in midstream of their training. They will learn in good time how to utilise these laws but not too long I hope. Anarchy will rule. :-(
It must take the full year police recruit training programme to assimilate the new laws. I had thirteen weeks and the perfectly adequate Sec 121 of the Highways act remain with me now. Gawd help them if they had to switch from the larceny Act to the Theft Act and Malicious and Wilful Damage Act to Criminal Law act in midstream of their training. They will learn in good time how to utilise these laws but not too long I hope. Anarchy will rule. :-(
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.