Nice To See Dame Priti Grovelling To His Majesty The King

[Canary42]

Frightened of losing her Damehood no doubt - LOL




https://uk.yahoo.com/news/priti-patel-apologises-king-email-220443142.html

[Hazi-Hammenuhoth]

This is not news.

[retrocop]

She had nothing to apologise to the king re the withdrawal of armed police security detail afforded him . He is no longer a working Royal. She was apologising to the king that someone, probably a private secretary, blabbed its content to the press and ultimately the public domain.

[youngmafbog]

Exactly Retro, but the AB commies cant see anything past the deep red specs they wear.

[Mozz71]

AB commies?

Getting more and more like a schoolyard here.

[Gromit]

Is it an apology to the King?
She bemoans the correspondence has been leaked, and that it could be embarrassing. But she hasn’t apologised for anything that she has done.

[retrocop]

The suggestion that protection at tax payers expense be withdrawn from a non working Royal who has become a virtual hermit does not warrant an apology.

[tomus42]

They're not saying she apologised to the king. They're saying she "apologised to the king". Note the quote marks.

There's nothing to apologise for anyway. They stopped Harry's protection when he became a non working royal, why not Andrew's.

[Peter Pedant]

They're not saying she apologised to the king. They're saying she "apologised to the king". Note the quote marks.

do you realise that a question in Philosophy Part II ( finals) at Cambridge was

Is John the same as 'John'?

I think it is asking you to discuss Names and Necessity by Saul Kripke (*)

(*)Kripke IS a character in Big Bang Theory on purpose - intentionally. First published paper at 16 apparently