Body & Soul2 mins ago
Boris May March But Tommy Not
Does it not seem outlandish that Robinson was taken out of the anti-Semitism march by the police?
https:/
Answers
//Still loved by some though//
09:48 Wed 29th Nov 2023
Hizb-ut-Tahrir can be called far right??? Yet not be sanctioned by you or the forces of law and order or the legacy media? They are the nice side of far right then I take it. Haha you are painting youself into a corner that will be a reference point for every subsequent post that you make. Clown posts tend to do that.
> I'm not sure how I should describe someone who objects to one man offering support to [British] Jews.
"Supporting" them would be doing as they politely requested. Since he did not do that, he did not support them. But if had supporting them, by doing as they politely requested, then perhaps they would have said something like "Thank you for your understanding".
You're going back on old ground and away from the OP, Togo.
On the OP:
1) Campaign Against Antisemitism organises a march
2) Campaign Against Antisemitism asks Tommy Robinson not to attend
3) The march starts
4) Tommy Robinson attends
5) Tommy Robinson is arrested
6) Far-right Khandro finds it "outlandish" that far-right Robinson is "taken out of the anti-Semitism march"
It doesn't seem outlandish to me ...
He is not supporting Jews, but you are supporting him. Here he is:
Robinson's birth name is Stephen Christopher Yaxley. The name Tommy Robinson is a pseudonym taken from a prominent member of the "Men In Gear" (MIG) football hooligan crew, which follows Luton Town Football Club. The name successfully hid Robinson's identity as Stephen Yaxley-Lennon and his criminal history, until the connection was uncovered in July 2010 by Searchlight magazine. Robinson has also used the names Andrew McMaster, Paul Harris, Wayne King, and Stephen Lennon.
Robinson has a long-standing criminal record. His convictions include for violence, stalking, financial and immigration frauds, drug possession and public order offences. He has been committed to prison for contempt of court. He has served at least four separate terms of imprisonment: in 2005 for assault, in 2012 for using false travel documents (a friend's passport in the name Andrew McMaster) to enter the United States, in 2014 for mortgage fraud, and, in May 2018, Robinson was committed to prison for 13 months for contempt of court after publishing a Facebook Live video of defendants entering a law court, contravening a court order that disallows reporting on such trials while proceedings are ongoing. On 1 August 2018, due to procedural errors, he was released on bail pending a new hearing of the case. On 5 July 2019, Robinson was again found guilty of contempt of court at the retrial and was committed at the Old Bailey to nine months in prison on 11 July․ Before his sentencing, Robinson appeared on InfoWars and appealed for political asylum in the United States. He was released from prison on 13 September 2019 after serving 9 weeks.
On 22 July 2021, Robinson was found to have libelled a 15-year-old refugee at a school in Huddersfield and was ordered to pay £100,000 plus legal costs, although Robinson had filed for bankruptcy in March 2021. In October 2021, he was made subject to a five-year stalking order for harassing the journalist Lizzie Dearden and her partner.
Now, Naomi, given that 100,000 genuinely were "supporting Jews", why are you focus on one man, Tommy Robinson, who wasn't.
> Err you didn't even attempt to answer this!
> The organisers of the Remembrance Day ceremonies asked the supporters of hamas not to attend ... they did anyway. Non were singled out for arbitrary arrest.
>Vee are asking ze kvestions ja?
That isn't this OP. It is old ground. But what's the question I didn't answer - is it "Non were singled out for arbitrary arrest - why not? " Because you didn't say "- why not?", I've added that. If that's the question then my answer is "I don't know". I'm not the police. I could guess the answer, like you could, but (unlike you) I don't guess an answer and then publish it on AnswerBank, as if it was a fact, in order to make a point that I can't substantiate.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.