T W A U ... The Chase....today's...
Film, Media & TV1 min ago
There is a stream near ch 231 carrying only the Post Office Tribunal. Steve Bradshaw in the chair and also Records Officer in certain cases.
He had put his signature to a letter dictated by the lawyers usually denying disclosure since there was no problem
and taken thro a whole load emails about the problems with Horizon that he KNEW about
oo-er M'lud !
Is anyone else watching ?
No best answer has yet been selected by Peter Pedant. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Doesn't bore me at all - without public pressure (and interest) the scumbags behind the perversion of justice which ruined so many lives would just have smiled away their lives in anonymity - spending the ludicrous 'performance bonuses' which their lies generated.
I've followed this for years in Private Eye and Computer Weekly - railing impotently about the crimes committed in the name of The Post Office - watching chickens come home to roost at last (following the brilliant ITV drama) is deeply satisfying.
nasty cop - and yes Steve Bradshaw treated interviews as PACE interviews ( police interviews under caution) and says a lot - I didnt say,
I dont remember them crying....
He has already said " I signed the disclosure list ( there is nothing further to disclose) and didnt look at the content of the letter, I left that to the lawyers"
"But Mr Bradshaw you were not the post-boy, you were the lead investigator" - yes but only for the cash shortfall and not Horizon....
I'd like to see the tv drama.
good three hours - and one hour documentary
which made me wonder ( as they say a few people have been welded together) what really happened.
currently - there were cash flow shortfalls which were prosecuted - - - " but if you knew this was due to horizon wd you have said so?" - answer no.
that is he knew horizon was faulty and related and still went ahead with prosecutions
eye boggling stuff
It is an inquiry and I did wonder about " You said..." " No I didnt...." - but the Judge did say it was his job to decide which one was true.
Steve Bradshaw ( telephone boy or lead investigator we never really found out which) was at the very end confronted with lawyers for the subpost masters
and did they cuss Steve as their clients wanted - Liar! Perjuror ! You killed my baby!
or did they try to get more reluctant info out of him. (*)
Anyway - tomorrow, more disclosure, this time from the so called computer expert - their phrase not mine - who maintained the computer software was robust far beyond the time they knew it wasnt.
(*) very obvious the Post Office are still very anal about information and take the view - Horizon was pretty crap, but there was alot going on without the computer system - and so they are still guilty
I am not at all clear on how the post office managed to prosecute so many people without suspecting that the computer system system was faulty.
It is inherently improbable that there were so many dishonest sub post-masters.
It is totally incomprehensible that the post office failed to act after the first handful of cases of suspected fraud.
It is inherently improbable that there were so many dishonest sub post-masters. - no I think they thought there was a lot of fraud out there and horizon was nailing it.
Somewhere in all the paper, there is a trainer (!) who has his debt double before his very eyes - - he leaves and I think pays off the non-debt
and elsewhere ( Horizon Issues Bates v Post office no 6) Frazer J says that it is obvioous that when there is an audit and a deficit, it is assumed ( by Bradshaw et al) that it is shortfall due to the SPM and that all that remains is to work out a way to repay
now THAT illuminated quite a lot of todays evidence.
Tomorrow: the man who said horizons was OK - when he knew it wasnt !
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.