Finance Profit Bot Trading App: Is It...
Arts & Literature6 mins ago
//A review into political violence is expected to recommend legislation to allow police to ban face masks at protests.
There is concern among some in Whitehall about the use of masks and scarves to hide protestors' identity during political marches and demonstrations.
This concern has been heightened following pro-Palestinian demonstrations during which some protestors have covered their faces. There have been clashes with police and anti-Semitic chanting among some that have attended the demonstrations.//
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.covering of faces is normal at protests it is not unique to the palestinian ones.
in my opinion it is a sensible thing to do and to ban it would allow the police to engage in targeted harassment and persecution of activists... they also reduce the transmission of airborne viruses and provide some very very limited protection against things like pepper spray
Those nembers of the public with a genuine grievance may well feel they are being thwarted from protest if they are banned from hiding their identity. Not all government is benevolent, there are plenty of historic examples (and present days ones) where being known as a critic of those in power marks the individual out as a target. One probably ought not take another step in the direction on citizen control like that. Arrest genuine troublemakers, leave the rest to show their support for whatever is being protested.
"a mask can impede facial recognition software and limit damage from gases or sprays"
Which of course is why people wear them and why some want to ban them. Understandable as that may be, I cannot really see how it would help: the real issue is the breaking of the law. Arrest people for doing that as I said before: wearing a mask might hide you from the law, but there are plenty of other uwelcome things you might be doing that should not. At which point the mask is irrelevant.
Another factor may be that some of them don't won't to be recognised by their employers, family or neigbours.
I am sure that untitled has his/her tongue in their cheek when they talk about the prevention of spread of airborne viruses being an explanation.
I think a ban is pointless for the reasons given by NewJudge and Ichkeria.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.