Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 20 of 21rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by piggynose. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

I've asked before but, why do Americans have to dress up their executions as science.

Shoot them and be done with instead of mulling and beard stroking.

"You can always count on the Americans to do the right thing....., after they've tried everything else" - Winston Churchill.

Proper drop hanging is the best method. However a bullet would do just as well, why they have to make such a circus of it baffles me.

The "circus" has lasted 34 years in this case. An absolute obscenity. 

Question Author

1988-2024 is 36 years !

For the numbers involved it's hardly worth the bother. And the time spent on death row - average more than ten years - is unconscionable. Do it quickly or don't do it at all.

Question Author

The americans seem to get a kick out of making their prisoners wait!! imho of course.

Deed done. The same news article gave conflicting views. One individual stating he convulsed for 25 minutes while another said that it had proved to be an effective and humane method of execution. So which was it ?

Where does it say, "he convulsed for 25 minutes"?

"I've been to four previous executions and I've never seen a condemned inmate thrash in the way that Kenneth Smith reacted to the nitrogen gas," Lee Hedgepeth told the BBC.

"Kenny just began to gasp for air repeatedly and the execution took about 25 minutes total."

 

...

 

"The nitrogen execution had been denounced by some medical professionals, who warned it could cause a range of catastrophic mishaps, ranging from violent convulsions to survival in a vegetative state."

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-68085513

 

There's a Japanese man who's spent 45 of his 87 years on death row. Man hadn't even orbited never mind landed on the moon when he was convicted 

Surely it's just another method of suffocation, isn't it?

Moon landing was in 1969, 55 years ago.

10 years more than the 45 he spent on death row.

Michael Portillo did a programme for Horizon called, "How To Kill A Human Being" and using nitrogen gas was discussed.

It's well worth a watch.

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7qecbb

 

Yes 56 years not 47 

My brain isn't working 

Why don't they inject them like they do animals, they just 'go to sleep' peacefully within seconds.  Just give a larger dose for humans.  If they are worried about one person being responsible they could give two or more jabs, some of which were placebos.

     

Lankeela

The authorities tried to do that from the onset but just could not find a intravenous vein. They, apparently tried both arms and legs.

                   

They do (did) that but have had trouble mechanically injecting the (strapped down) subject & drugs firms have refused to supply the necessary medication.

 

They can't use a jag now because of difficulties getting supplies of the drugs that were previously used.

As said above, String up is best if done properly, Albert Pierrepoint had it down to a fine art.  Otherwise yes use a bullet and send the relatives the bill for it.

What gets me is the hand wringing for the perpetrator.  What about his victim and her grisly end?

1 to 20 of 21rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Breaking News!

Answer Question >>