Chelmsford Cancer Charity Quiz
Quizzes & Puzzles3 mins ago
They appear to think that everyone is out to get them - they could have quit whilst ahead but continued.
all this money over a lamp!
No best answer has yet been selected by Redhelen72. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Neighbourhood disputes can, and do, develop into the most entrenched and bitter arguments two people can ever have.
Everyone's home is his castle, but even if your neighbours vex you in any way, a war of attrition is never the answer.
Rarely are such disputes settled in court without ruinous expense, as this couple have discovered.
The problem is, what starts out as a nuisance becomes a crusade, and then an obsession, and that 'need to win' wipes out all reason, and that is why this couple find themselves where they are.
Of course they see themselves as 'victims' because they were 'victims' from the start, that's their default position.
The notion of not chasing your quarry over a cliff never enters their minds, and I would not be surprised if they carried on with their legal actions until they bankrupt themselves.
You have to pick your battles, they didn't, and pronbably won't again.
Bizarre behaviour, just buy blinds and/or blackout curtains as suggested above. It's what we did for the grandchildren here.
//You shouldn't be forced to install curtains because your neighbours choose to shine a light in your windows at night.//
Read the story, they didnt the light is 'bounced' of a wall(See TCL's post) Besides if you want total darkness go live in the country.
Bammy. Fitting a blind to the window would have done the job and been a lot cheaper.
as AH said, agreed - BUT the lawyers should NOT have said "oh goody goody where is your pension? - give me every last penny!"
but instead - a JR ( hundred thou for one day, Jesus) was a waste of time.
( translation: JR is a high court action, ( v.v. V expensive) where they asked a judge to rule the county court was obviously wrong. He didnt) -
we got up to £10 000 in a border dispute - and each side found its own costs
and THEN the opposing solicitors were run out of business ( yes Milne and Lyall of Bridport) on another matter where their icky practices caught up with them
https:/
and for the mods
https:/
( clozzied - not there now - all gone)