Editor's Blog25 mins ago
Plod And The C P S Think He Did It.....
https:/
They have also arrested 4 other men for assisting. Take your pardners for the usual dance. 💃🕺
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.loosen your partner and send them back to their seats
they arrested four men on suspicion of assisting an offender. I will now make this more portentous in the standard TTT fashion boo boo shang a lang. fiddle faddle foo !
suspicion is as we already know, or should know ( boop! boop!) is " anything not fanciful."
(Old accessory after the fact. Max sentence in murder used to be - the Hangman!) This can be a big deal.
Ynaf - // I stand by Daves answer to my post Andy.These people would never return to Pakistan/Bangladesh voluntarily.No way.Go from a first world country to a failed sheesh-hole state.Nah. //
You, and Dave, are probably right.
But an answer offered as a view, and an answer offered as a fact, are two different things.
I have no problem with the view that the couple would not have returned to Pakistan, it's a view I share.
But it can't be stated as a fact, because we don't know for sure what they may have done, or may do in the future.
I really hope I am not falling down the same rabbit hole as with my lengthy argument with TTT on another thread.
When my pointing out that supposition and fact are not the same thing, led to an exchange that went on for days.
ynna - // Nah,Andy,you are wrong, me and Dave are right.Once these people get to the UK they arent going to leave. //
I suggest you are not reading my posts closely enough - please read my post at 09:50 -
// You, and Dave, are probably right.
But an answer offered as a view, and an answer offered as a fact, are two different things.
I have no problem with the view that the couple would not have returned to Pakistan, it's a view I share. //.
TTT - //
AH is as usual playing sementics, yes it is theoretically possible that :
a) He didn't do it
b) He's not a muslim
c) He + family would definitately not be staying in the UK as long as they could.
In reality we know that all 3 are extremely unlikely. //
I'm not 'playing semantics' - which is the science of meaning and its interpretations.
I am stating that there is a fundamental difference between offering a statement of possiblity -
'The man may be a Muslim, we don't actually know if he is or not, but it is likely, on evidence, that he is.'
and a statement of fact -
'The man is a Muslim'.
Now I am happy to go with the first, but from the opening of your contribution, you stated the first.
I said then, and say now - a supposition is just that, it is not a fact.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.