Kinnochio Is Not Convinced...and He'd Know!

[ToraToraTora]

https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1897932/neil-kinnock-labour-keir-starmer-1992-general-election

Laura K also says it's not a foregone conclusion:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68995187

"What Labour bosses never forget - even if some of its more excitable supporters do - is that to win a majority, the party has to win a swing bigger than Tony Blair did in 1997, when he redrew the electoral map.

To have a majority of even one MP, Keir Starmer, Rachel Reeves, Wes Streeting, Angela Rayner and the rest of his team have to do better - far better - than Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, John Prescott, Jack Straw, David Blunkett and the rest."

 

[Spungle]

He's stating the obvious. There's no incentive whatsoever to vote for the knighted robot and the fishwife.  Hung parliament here we come.

[bednobs]

that's really odd ... i had a recollection he died!

clearly not

[Spungle]

Glenys died.

[douglas9401]

Are you mixing him up with Micky The Jacket?

[youngmafbog]

Well they could start by trying to win the election rather than let the TINO's lose it.

Surely it cant be that difficult?

[jno]

sounds exactly like what Sadiq Khan was saying a week or so ago.

[Paul22118]

What he was trying to get across was that he sees the situation that Tory voters just wish Rishi would get on with things such as solving the boat problem.  There is disenchantment, but at the ballot box those voters just cannot bring themselves to vote Labour.  And he is right.  Expect a Conservative win with a slender but workable majority.