Body & Soul1 min ago
No Further Action To Be Taken Against Woman Who Re-Tweeted...
...false information which could have sparked anti-refugee riots.
Have others been convicted and sentenced for doing the same thing?
If that has happened why has she received preferential treatment?
Answers
1 to 10 of 10
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sandyRoe. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
There was no evidence, plod acting like Stasi now have to back down.
I suspect the difference here is she could afford a brief rather than one in Chairman Starmers pocket who stood up for her. The others should not be in jail unless proven to have caused it, which is really unlikely.
Its highly unlikey the yobs that threw bricks at the rozzers and were rightly locked up were infulenced by anything than their usual thiggish attitudes.
No action against this man.
https:/
her offence seemed rather cautious, she said "If this is true..." and deleted her post when she found it wasn't. On the other hand she was the first to publicise the fake name, which did much to prompt the riots, so she's caused the country a lot of bother and expense; so no sympathy from me about her time in the cells.
Why was no action at all taken against this clown?
https:/
Surely these MP's are no protecting him?
https:/
1 to 10 of 10
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.