News3 mins ago
Winter Fuel Cut Savings Will Be Far Less Than Reeves Expected
//a new analysis suggests that a surge in claims for pension credit since the cut was announced means that any savings could be significantly lower than the Treasury had anticipated. In just eight weeks, applications have increased by 152%.//
That, together with the estimated extra cost to the NHS of £169 million has the potential of seeing Reeves score a devasting home goal.
https:/
Has she done her sums - and if so, has she got them right?
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.“Really this is about the preposterous idea that someone can have £50k in savings and still apply for benefits!”
By your reasoning your outrage could really be applied to the entire State Pension payments, Auntypoll.
A person’s savings (and other financial matters) should not (and rightly does not) influence a person’s State Pension payments (which, in my view, includes the WFA).
Actually what’s more preposterous is that a person earning £50k year will have to pay £2,993 in National Insurance contributions to be credited with a “qualifying year” (the number of those years determining his State Pension sum). Meanwhile person earning just £6,396 pa but less than £12,584 (or even nothing at all in some circumstances) will pay absolutely nothing in NI contributions but will still be credited with the same “qualifying year”. Both will receive the same State Pension when such years are calculated.
I see the WFA as part of the “State Pension Package”. Lots of pension schemes have additional benefits and the government likes you to believe the State Pension is like a proper pension scheme, by insisting you qualify for its benefits. What it seems to overlook is that few proper pension schemes make payments to those who have made no contributions.
What should influence those payments is the amount of contributions made, but it doesn’t seem to work that way.
The only change that necessary is that the WFA should be added to the recipients' total income for tax purposes.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.