What Was The Best Windows Operating...
Computers10 mins ago
Driving A Daqger Through The Heart Of The Climate Change Religion.....
59 Answers
No one doubts climate change, the planet is continually changing but has it become a religion for some? Beliefs without reason? Illogical deductions? Assignation of blame with no evidence? Just a few of the things this deity tends to do.
Answers
Meanwhile, the UK has spent more than £200bn over the last decade installing wind and solar energy sources. This is very intermittent supply. As I write, wind is meeting 6% of demand and solar, unsurpisingly, nil. Gas, which the UK government has refused to exploit from our own resources, is meeting 55% of demand. Much of his is imported from the USA and...
18:20 Fri 14th Mar 2025
09:25 of course but it's the source of those gases that is disputed. The biggest emmitters of CO2 are the oceans then the fauna. Many other sources. Yet mankind with control of 4% can somehow change the balance? Water vapour is the most potent green house gas, the atmosphere is full of it. Look what happened on Venus with no help from mankind at all. Just saying I think that as always scientist are susceptable to selective conclusions based on the reality of funding.
> references to movies
The film tells the story of two astronomers attempting to warn humanity about an approaching comet that will destroy human civilization. The impact event is an allegory for climate change, and the film is a satire of government, political, celebrity, and media indifference to the climate crisis."
I'm not a scientist, most people on this website are not scientists, let alone climate scientists. Arguing the toss from a standpoint of ignorance is pointless. I believe the overwhelming experience of climate scientists. Others don't for some reason ... the allegorical movie demonstrate the frustrations perfectly.
a warmer planet will also start to generate much more co2 once warming gets past a certain point e.g. by melting permafrost that has huge amounts of co2 frozen in it. such an emission would not technically be man made in that it didn't come from anything we burned... but it would still be a massive increase in atmospheric co2 caused by us.
-- answer removed --
Are we still in the Pleistocene ice age?
Striking during the time period known as the Pleistocene Epoch, this ice age started about 2.6 million years ago and lasted until roughly 11,000 years ago. Like all the others, the most recent ice age brought a series of glacial advances and retreats. In fact, we are technically still in an ice age
Human beings, having been around for just a short time, doesn't prevent us from investigating, learning, understanding. Trends are seen, hypothesis made and ways found to confirm or deny them to create theories. It's science and the best way we have to understand what is going on and why.
It seems highly probable that our past & present activities have/are pushing things over the edge, and this is the majority verdict of scientists, by a long way.
The legitimate compaint concerns those extreme activists who, as far as their own country is concerned, want ridiculously excessive activity, which will disadvantage it, while not sufficiently concerned to concentrate instead on nations elsewhere, where such intense lobbying would be more appropriate.
The world (or at least the human species) once more proving that, as a group, they have gone insane. Maybe they always were.
Alright, folks, gather around! We’ve been LIED to! The idea that humans could possibly alter the entire Earth’s climate? Preposterous!
Fact: Volcanoes exist. They burp more CO₂ in a day than my car does in a lifetime.
Fact: Trees love CO₂. More CO₂ = happier trees = more oxygen for us. Science!
Fact: It still snows. A lot. Ice caps? They’ve been melting since the Ice Age.
Yet, Big Climate wants us to believe we should feel guilty for enjoying a warm summer day? Pfft. They just want more carbon taxes, more regulations, and fewer backyard BBQs.
Meanwhile, the billionaires pushing this agenda are jet-setting in their private planes, buying beachfront mansions, building motorways throught rainforests and sipping margaritas on the supposedly doomed coastlines.
So, is climate change real? Maybe. But is the hysteria overblown and mostly about control and money? You bet.
"Climate Change" as now called (probabky becasue every otgher name like Gobal warming has been shown to be incorrect) is an activists dream and is perpetuated by Governments because they know they can control and tax us.
As pointed out above, if such a problem and you believe it why fly in private jets, why buy beach fron properties(Obama looking at you) and the plethora of other things that show this to be a nonsence.
If we really wanted to make the planet a better place then how about starting with polution, it is measurable and cant be argued with plus we can all help quite quickly.
Ideally a 50 year plan needs to be drafted, we cannot have the elites living in luxury whilst the poor strive due to rubbish like Millibans Net zero. Using pollution we effectivley will achieve the same aim but in a timely and measured manner. For some reason no one wants this? Is it becasue when something is measured and progress is seen to be made taxes cant be raised off the back of it I do wonder?
Latest Posts
ChatterBank14 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles28 mins ago
Crosswords33 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles42 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.