Sir Keir Starmer Under, Fresh...
News2 mins ago
No best answer has yet been selected by Kathyan. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Can you please explain why you think they should be taken back into state ownership?
Neither of you have given a reason.
If they were taken back into state ownership then the tax payer would have to subsidise any cost increases.
I also don't see how you can blame a water shortage, the cause of which has a lot to do with low rainfall, on privatisation........... please explain?
With regards to the gas price increases, these stem from the original suppliers of the gas itself and not from the privatised suppliers hiking prices for profit benefits. If it was state run then these higher costs will still be incurred and the taxpayer will have to bear the brunt of the extra cost whether they use gas or not.
Same with the water pipe network, there are millions of pounds worth of repairs needed on an ageing system. Again if these were state owned then the taxpayer will still feel the burden in the form of extra taxes.
If this were to happen then you would be the first to moan about why you pay such high tax rates.
Aside to this, the problems the utilities companies are facing have ALWAYS been there and it is not a new thing at all. In fact it is one of the reasons that these services were privatised in the first place. People have short memories!
You had better get in touch with reality, we (the world) are starting to run out of oil and gas just about .......NOW.
Who owns the delivery systems makes no difference whatsoever
You might not notice that fact for a few years yet but what you will see is the steady increase in energy costs as more and more countries realise this and are prepared to pay more (pushing the prices up) to get their hands on what is left.
If you doubt this then google "peak oil" or go here and read the home page.