ChatterBank1 min ago
drug trials
what do you think? - Although I feel 'sorry' for Ryan Wilson - I am surprised that he is going to clain compensation from the drug company..
"He is chasing compensation from drug test company Parexel and the manufacturer TeGenero. He said he was told the only side-effects would be nausea and headaches"
It was his decision to take the trial.....
http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/story_pages/ne ws/news2.shtml
/>
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by PEATBOG. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I don't know why so many people have a problem with people making money from Drug trials. Do people really think it would be done for free. Whats �2,000 in this day and age anyway considering what drug companies do make in terms of profits. I don't see it any worse than people selling kiss and tell to newspapers and getting hundreds and thousands of pounds for it.
Lets be honest, if you could make a quick �2,000 would you really say no. I bet these people never in a hundred years thought it would go as badly wrong as it did. My Brother has done drug trials for Rehus Negative blood but he did not get paid for it, he only had to give blood on a regular basis so not really high risk but if he got a couple of hundred for that would it really be seen as so very wrong and greedy of him.
I hope they do get a set limit of compensation but not millions of pounds. Maybe �10,000 or something like that.
It should really depend on whether or not the drug companies acted irresponsibly or negligently.
Obvioulsy anyone taking part in drugs trials should be aware there is a risk, however if there is any inkling that the drug company thought there may be deadly side effects then I would have thought compensation was in order.
Otherwise I'm afraid its really one to put down so others can learn a lesson from it.
Very sad though and could ultimately put back drug trialling of some very useful drugs of course.
I don't have a problem with anyone making money from drugs tests willspal, as long as it isn't me.
The nearest I ever came to this is when I asked one chap what happened to his arm to have that big plaster on it (about 6inch by 4) "Oh nothing, I'm testing out some skin creams for a drugs company". "Let's have a look then" says I. He pealed the plaster back to reveal five or six strips of areas of skin in various states of metamorphisis, or decay or somthing strange anyway!
I asked him was it worth it and he said "Well it's the money isn't it?"
I couldn't help thinking to myself , You must love money with all your heart and soul mate.
Anyway just how poor can a student be when he's a Swedish national at university in Sweden?
Drugs companies do tests to help save human lives. He will probably be draining money resources for new superdrus or something if he wins.
He was not the only one. Six of the volunteers who were given the drug became severely ill. Two of them are still in critical condition. See here. Some are questioning why all of them were given the drug at the same time. I think they should be compensated. That is the responsible thing for the drug company to do and they have plenty of money. So, if you were experimenting on somebody and they were severely harmed, could you honestly say " Oh well, you volunteered. You knew there was a risk. Tough luck!". I couldn't. I also think volunteers for trials should be paid. They are volunteering their time and providing a valuable service for the company.
This drug trial was the first in the round of human trials. This drug had never been given to humans before and befoer they go to trial, the drug company has to go through so many hoops to get to this stage.
When they start testing, the people who are doing the tested get paid handsomely for it, but have to sign documentation that they understand that this is an untested drug and the company can't possibly know for sure what kind of effect it will have. The candidates are pampared in the extreme in the unit and have literally everything they could desire while on trial, all they have to do is have the medicine and allow the doctors to take all their fluids that come out of them.
The candidates (though unfortunate) would have signed a mandate stating they understood the risks.
The drug trial could not 'go wrong' it was a trial, they wanted to see if it would have any harmful effects. The trial went right. They found out loads about it.
if they had not done this, they could have been sitting on a cure for arthritis for all they knew and never knew because it hadn't been tested. hence the point of testing.
That being said, I do feel for the candidates and I hope they will go on to make as best recovery as they can.