Can Someone Handcuff The Strictly...
Film, Media & TV2 mins ago
No best answer has yet been selected by Zen. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Contd.
Lastly, I can only give you excerpts from the ICRC reports, since they have not released the entire report but only a synopsis to the New York Times. Read here: http://www.ngowatch.org/articles.php?id=206 , especially the paragraph annotated "Torture is Not What the ICRC Says it Is"... very enlightening, in my opinion...
We aren't gonna change each others opinions and I'm sure Zen's mailbox is filling up with notifications...
"Striving to impose democracy"...brilliant! And I might add exactly what you are doing "imposing".You can't "impose" democracy, if you do it isn't democracy. It's totally laughable that what is clearly now the most corrupt country on the planet who dares to call the International Red Cross in this link you have supplied "unaccountable propaganderists" has the downright bloody nerve given their history of repression and unwanted political and military involvement to continue wading in anywhere.
And you finally admit that you do not have a link to a Red Cross report saying all is well, just a second hand snippet of information taken from an pro American website quote
"The U.N. General Assembly (where the despots and dysfunctionals vastly outnumber the free and self-determining nations)" .
Glad you see us that way, and very pleased I'm not a US citizen, as I'd die of shame for what your country is involved with.
I have followed this debate with interest over the last few days, whilst working, and haven't had the time to add anything more than I have said already. Noxlumus, I applaud you. Every comment you have made is how so many of us see the whole situation. I too am really glad to live in Europe and could never envisage living in the USA because I would be ashamed of what it has now become, the most selfish and arrogant nation on this earth.
Contd.
Lastly, 2,500 young American men and women died as well as some from Poland, Italy and yes, the U.K. imposing the right of the Iraqis to choose democracy... which they did with overwhelming pride indicated by the upheld purple fingers... first time ever, in thousands of years, they actually have a choice. As soon as they can stand on their own two feet, we'll be out of there... just as we did in England, France and the rest of Europe on at least two occasions.... your welcome, by the way...
i love the way when americans get defensive the old chestnut of "we rescued you in two world wars" and a comment like, you're welcome, as if every american since is owed some great debt forever regardless of age or sacrifice, i agree their was sacrifice, but the US weren't willing comabatants and let this country and europe as a whole down with it's procrastination, even courting hitlar and the nazi party at one stage
i may be doing you a diservice clanad, perhaps you were there in WW2? if so i appologise, if not you are trading on the bravery of others in my opinion
i would point out i have a great deal of respect and admiration for the men and women who serve their country, i come from a military family and my whole issue with americas and my own countries foreign policy is that it is sending our service people into situations that are avoidable and in my view morally wrong... i am not attacking your right to voice an opinion as i hope you will respect mine, however i don't agree with you
We'll terminate this thread with a history lesson... cardiacbleed, there is a valid reason for referencing WWI and WWII. In both cases, as you have reiterated, the U.S. was a latecomer in terms of troops. However you overlook the rescue of England through the Lend-Lease Act, wherein tons and tons of war materials were literally given to England and other European countries. England was literally broke in 1939-40 and couldn't pay for another rifle bullet when Roosevelt and his administration, struggling to overcome the isolationists who remembered Europe's carnage in WWI, forced through the Act. The cost in todays dollars would have been in the trillions.
Is there not a dicotomy at work here? On one had the U.S. is criticized for being late to the party in WWI and WWII, but were accused of jumping the gun and acting like cowboys in being in the lead confronting terrorists in this conflict. Unique concept.
Contd.
really good post maxximus
clanad i was unaware of the lend lease act thanks for the heads up, although i like to do research and from this it appears that a number of issues cropped up, the lend lease act was an exchange of weapons for money, the act itself was only passed through congress by ONE vote and a fact i wasn't clear on previously, it was hitler that declared war on the USA a few days after pearl harbour and not the USA joining the war to aid us but their hand was forced, unless my internet research is inaccurate (always a possibility) that we have both learnt something?
i fail to see how you can somehow link the acts of todays foreign policy with FDR's time if anything they are two shinning examples of mishandling and botching international affairs not an opportunity to say, damned if you do, damned if you don't
I admire all your postings so much. noxlumus, maxximus, zen , cardiacbleed, dom and others. Your points are all put so well and are so understandable. I wish I had your skills. This thread has been such a good and thought provoking read.
Clanad, I am not discrediting you in any way. I respect you have your views as well, but I have to agree with the majority here. You do seem somewhat blinkered though!
Thanks for posting this Zen.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.