Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
Lord Levy 's arrest...was he fingerprinted and swabbed ??
Is it standard procedure to fingerprint and DNA swab anyone who is arrested?. In this case it would be appropriate from evidence gathering point of view. 'No I did not see that honours application'....yeah but your fingerprints are on the top right hand of the application. Oh for a front row seat.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Dom Tuk. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.See this earlier answer:
http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/How-it-Works/Qu estion259500.html
Whether Lord Levy was subjected to the ignominies piled upon the rest of us lesser mortals is anybody's guess!
http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/How-it-Works/Qu estion259500.html
Whether Lord Levy was subjected to the ignominies piled upon the rest of us lesser mortals is anybody's guess!
Unfortunately, not true, dyli. In order to have the right to take fingerprints, DNA swabs etc., the police merely need to arrest you for an "arrestable offence".
The arrest does NOT have to result in a subsequent charge before samples can be taken. What constitutes an "arrestable offence" was recently broadened(in the last year or two) so that the most trivial offences (dropping litter, walking without due care and attention) can be considered 'arrestable' and your DNA well and truly swabbed - whether or not you are eventually charged is irrelevant.
This was all introduced in the name of the war against terrorism, of course.
The arrest does NOT have to result in a subsequent charge before samples can be taken. What constitutes an "arrestable offence" was recently broadened(in the last year or two) so that the most trivial offences (dropping litter, walking without due care and attention) can be considered 'arrestable' and your DNA well and truly swabbed - whether or not you are eventually charged is irrelevant.
This was all introduced in the name of the war against terrorism, of course.
Loosehead - as you can see from JudgeJ's link, he does not have to be charged for fingerprints and samples to be taken. That will be done after arrest, even if the arrest was mistaken and the DNA can be kept permanently. Rather than being bailed to a court, it is more likely that he has been bailed to appear at a police station at a later date, after enquiries have been continued. My guess is that the CPS will be asked for an opinion in this complex case before anyone is charged.
Who can see the connection between three facts?
1. DNA samples can be taken after arrest, even if the arrest is wrong, and kept for ever.
2. Anyone can now be arrested for any offence.
3. DNA would be a useful addition to the national identity database.
Who can see the connection between three facts?
1. DNA samples can be taken after arrest, even if the arrest is wrong, and kept for ever.
2. Anyone can now be arrested for any offence.
3. DNA would be a useful addition to the national identity database.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.