ChatterBank3 mins ago
is it true that george bush had no passport when elected
20 Answers
is it true that george bush had no passport when elected
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by lukertweek. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.When he entered the White House, George W Bush did not hold a valid passport. However, according to
http://www.heartland.it/geopolitics_george_w_b ush_dream.html
prior to his election apart from "a few excursions into Mexico aside, [he] had only been abroad twice." So one has to surmise that he had held a valid passport at some point before he was elected.
http://www.heartland.it/geopolitics_george_w_b ush_dream.html
prior to his election apart from "a few excursions into Mexico aside, [he] had only been abroad twice." So one has to surmise that he had held a valid passport at some point before he was elected.
johnlambert's point is something that should be taken into consideration.
Imagine you lived on a continent where you could go skiing in Colorado, surfing in California, gambling in Las Vegas, hiking in the Rockies, shopping in Boston, sailing in Nantucket, star-spotting in Los Angeles, dancing in Chicago and murdered in New York...
...who would really need to visit another country???
Imagine you lived on a continent where you could go skiing in Colorado, surfing in California, gambling in Las Vegas, hiking in the Rockies, shopping in Boston, sailing in Nantucket, star-spotting in Los Angeles, dancing in Chicago and murdered in New York...
...who would really need to visit another country???
Yes, I'd be interested to hear the evidence for the cocaine claim. I don't think you need a passport to go to Mexico or Canada, though, or at least you didn't in those pre-terrorism days (Americans might like to correct me if I'm wrong there), so Bush may have managed without. As others have said, the USA is a huge and varied country, and Americans do not get long holidays; so they tend to stick close to home.
By sheer coincidence, only days ago US Congress voted an amendment to the proposed changes to passport requirements under the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative.
From June 1, 2009 US citizens will require a passport for land crossings at the Mexican and Canadian borders, and for cruise passengers coming to the US from the Caribbean, Mexico, Canada or Bermuda.
US citizens travelling by air to these regions are required to have a passport by January 8, 2007.
From June 1, 2009 US citizens will require a passport for land crossings at the Mexican and Canadian borders, and for cruise passengers coming to the US from the Caribbean, Mexico, Canada or Bermuda.
US citizens travelling by air to these regions are required to have a passport by January 8, 2007.
BTW the allegation of cocaine usage by GW was made by his ex sister-in-law Sharon and his contempories at Yale.
http://www.cocaine.org/george-bush/index.html
http://www.cocaine.org/george-bush/index.html
As to the point about not travelling outside the US - there are 50 states + DC. That's 51 countries in effect. When the day comes that there's a federal Europe, we'll no longer need passports for travel within the EU (technically we shouldn't now, but that's a different argument). And how many Europeans have been outside Europe?
Whickerman - yep and with 39 Historic counties in Britain there is never a need to go abroad, all of them are completely different and give us a chance to sample other cultures.
And as for the idea that Europe is the same as the US, The US has effectively less that 400 years of history most of which was built as a single union, Europe on the other had as many different units all with different languages and deep routed culture built over the last 1000 years plus.
And as for the idea that Europe is the same as the US, The US has effectively less that 400 years of history most of which was built as a single union, Europe on the other had as many different units all with different languages and deep routed culture built over the last 1000 years plus.
I think it should be clear to most that there is much more variety of culture and perspective in Europe than in the many states of the US, however that is not the extent of the argument, since we are not just talking Europe, but the entire world ... world leaders with perspective on the many and varied countries and cultures of the world would be a major advantage for the future of the planet - especially when we are talking about world leaders with the power to extend military might to these countries.
Without perspective, the only attitude one can expect is one of selfishness and hostility.
Without perspective, the only attitude one can expect is one of selfishness and hostility.
-- answer removed --