If we were not at war in the middle East -how much better off financially would we be? How much is this war costing ?Would Brown reduce the taxes? who is making the ammunition and equipment etc. for all our armed forces to use to fight this war?? I remember being told at school that this country has only ever been 100% employed when we are at war.
Which isn't terrible, seeing as the budget tends to be over �500bn a year.
You ask about Gordon Brown cutting taxes. Don't be daft. You're talking about the only Old Labour principle retained by New Labour.
I imagine some private companies are getting lucrative commissions for the equipment, and making a gloriously large amount of gloriously filthy money for their trouble.
your right war creats econamy the logistics involved in the campaigns then the contracts secured to rebiuld the devastated infastructure once the conflict is over.
Things just do not alter, before the war in the middle east we were told they couldn't afford this, and they couldn't afford that.
Then when the war started they suddenly could afford the cost for that.
And when the war is over, the savings will suddenly disappear once again. It's always been the same in this country.
Our involvement in Iraq hasn't been too great, relatively speaking; we might be the second biggest contributors but this is mainly a US war, and it's seriously hurting them-