Technology9 mins ago
here's one for you answerbok
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by TRINITY. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I'm curious what everyone else thinks, too!
Anything that puts the Corporation in a bad light...and there has been plenty of that...has been wildly played down and anything that seems critical of Government just as manically played up. Try to catch the reports of Nicholas Witchell on the 1pm bulletin, for example, once the Hutton nonsense restarts...then decide whether they believe in 'censorship' or 'playing with' the news! (If you're not familiar with his presentation-style, you'll need to get used to listening to someone who speaks in individual words, rather than sentences or even phrases, such as the rest of us do.)
Now, the 'Standard' is known to be a Government-hating newspaper and its report was based on a supposed leak. The Committee's own report is due to be published tomorrow (Thur 11) so was it impossible for the BBC to wait less than 24 hours and see whether the 'Standard' had got it right or wrong?
It may well be that it is true and Mr Hoon really is in trouble, but why the rush to lay blame where possibly none is due?
It is truly appalling from a supposedly unbiased news organisation. What would be really fascinating - for me at least - would be for the newspaper report to be shown tomorrow to be mistaken. Might I then expect ten minutes of grovelling apology from the BBC with footage of a 'relaxed' Defence Secretary instead of an 'embattled' or beleaguered' one, which is how they generally describe him? Some hope!
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.