mmm...? it was on aol's main page about the new baby.
i thought it was strange as it would have been born at about 6 months, given she had one in september - but now i can't find it! the only one i can see had been completely rewritten and adds talks of pathology reports and investigations etc
i would say i just must have misread it, but i read and re-read the story a few times as i couldn't understand it, so i know that is definitely what it said - i can only assume that it was worded wrongly - the news of the baby 3 days ago was in the first paragraph - and her son who died was first mentioned at the end... perhaps there was something wrong with the text, perhaps it got jumbled as it does in some windows...or a lazy journalist cut and pasted from the story about her son but didn't edit it very well....mmm curious though
sorry anyway, it appears not to be the case - its too similar to the story of her son dying 3 day after the birth.
i think she should have received a small portion of the money - i mean there was plenty to go round!!
i have no doubt that HJM promised her some of it, if only by mouth, and she made a man whose life was effectively over, a very happy man for the last 13 months of it.
you can't take it with you and he basically made sure his final year alive was a happy one.
they both knew the deal, and i am sure she was fond of him - for her to say she was in love with him is just silly - he knew the score and was happy with it.
she fulfilled her part of the deal, he should have fulfilled his.