ChatterBank2 mins ago
huntley & carr
I always thought only previous convictions were read out after a verdict, not allegations; [no matter how relevant] is this a new idea. I think he's as guilty as hell, so don't get the wrong idea. Also if only for the families, classmates of the girls, people of Soham & those who worked on the case; I think the media & TV specials ought to be wound down. Isn't it strange all the experts have appeared 'I knew he was guilty by his body language etc '' are now appearing.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by paulz. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Some of his previous alleged crimes were a matter of public record having been published in a local paper in Grimsby, where they are both originally from, so there was no problem in getting this info...The only reason the Beeb and others didn't splash the info about sooner was publishing restrictions so as not to bias any jurors.
Actually I watched the beeb's programme last night and must say that everyone expressed the opposite opinion to you, in that Carr at least, was a hugely convincing liar up to the point they presented her with the forensic evidence.