I didn't say he was guilty because of the way he looks, i did say i didn't like the look of him and that she looks scared of him. but it is not the basis of my argument... Smoke and fire does come in to it though i am affraid, the whole thing from thier prospective looks like they were involved, the witnesses for them have been really lame and non helpfull some times, one woman decides the next day she saw something, yeh right, blood in the hire car, it don't sound good to me. Then she washed the toy, if it was me, that thing would have been put in a bag and treasured, i would want my daughters smell kept even if it was accompanied by a dog turd. The British police have got involved by getting her diary, do you think they would have got involved without a little bit of proof, i think not. And i din't call you stupid, you just read that into it, if you really do look at the evedence we have, there is no way that you can say 100% they did or didn't do it.