Donate SIGN UP

Death penalty for Steve Wright

Avatar Image
Laura Loo | 22:20 Thu 21st Feb 2008 | News
116 Answers
Following his conviction for the murders of five prostitutes in Ipswich the families of some of the girls call for the reintroduction of the death penalty for crimes such as this.

What do you think?
Gravatar

Answers

81 to 100 of 116rss feed

First Previous 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Laura Loo. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Same to you Louisa 69...

Lets hope Hugh has a relaxed, trouble free night too ;o))
Sir Prize Pi$$ off. Get to bed you cretin.
Lol - sorry about getting the initials wrong. Had to nip off quickly for a few mins, and mis-typed.
Hugh - talking through your Jass again.

All I did was quote YOUR OWN words.

Goodnight - hope you sleep with your conscience.
-- answer removed --
I agree with that. there's a rule for one, and a rule for the others, and the higher up te social scale you go, the less likely you are to be "troubled" by these things that keep happening.
I'm all for the national DNA database. I think that would act as a better deterent than sitting for 20+ yrs on Death Row like they do in the USA. If it was only a matter of time before you were caught I think that would put off a lot of people to start with.
If he has to spend the rest of his life in prison let it be hard labour - theres a pile of rocks theres a hammer. hit the rocks with the hammer for 18 hours a day and we will give you something to go with your bread and water. Come to think about it if we did that with most of our prisoners it would probably scare them straight.
good idea Phantaxus - back to Victorian values and a rat infested hole

cool username BTW lol
Nope let him live and suffer rest of his life in prison
Wow. 90 answers so far and it took until the 85th before anyone said anything sensible.
and wheres your answer quin?
I agree with you, actually.
beanebabe
I agree with you but you'll have the Civil Liberties lot going mad.
As for Hugh Jass -I bet he's a Christian.
Some very strong feelings shown on this subject, and very rightly so. But let's try and get it into prospective.

These victims were women that voluntary were in a high risk profession, for their own personal gain. It has been said on this site before, when reports have been made regarding the loss of young life in Iraq and Afghanistan, that our armed forces know of the risks involved when they volunteer.

Returning to the case in question, yes this low life deserves all he gets. But he has not got off lightly, he will never be released from prison. Yet we constantly witness murderers of innocent children, old persons and decent women, get off with much lesser sentences that this person got.

-- answer removed --
What do you mean 'very flimsy' evidence? Explain.

Wright shouldn't get the death penalty. He should be punished, and very severely so. But he shouldn't get death.

Why? Because it's easy to call for the murderer's blood and to 'go with your gut'. But that sentiment is exactly the kind of thing that shouldn't be anywhere near the judicial system. One of the reasons (though not the main one in my view) why the death penality as a whole is a bad idea is to exclude that from the system.

Before it's inevitably thrown at me, I'd like to point out that this stance does not mean that I 'don't care' about the victims: of course I care. I just don't think that it should come into the judicial process. At all.
I'm amazed at some of the answers, yes, life should mean life, but then we'er paying for him to stay alive, and if at some point in the future, for whatever reason, he gets released, (and it can happen), there's then nothing to stop him re-offending,

And no, this is not a kneejerk reaction, I was never in favour of it being abolished in the first place, we need an ultimate deterrent, and we don't have one.

Regardless of their trade, these girls never harmed anyone, and didn't deserve what happened to them.
Actually the death penalty doesn't necessarily reduce cost. If someone's sentenced to death they'll (naturally) exercise the right to appeal as much as they can, which increases cost.

I'm not saying that imprisonment is cheaper, but it's not necessarily drastically more expensive (though admittedly it does depend on the case).

Neither does capital punishment work as a deterrent. If you're at the point of being as messed up as this chap is, it won't stop you. Plus people are more deterred by the idea of getting caught at all despite what getting caught actually means.
There is no 'ultimate deterrent'. There never has been,
even when the penalty was half-hanging followed by
disembowelment, or burning alive.

I seem to recall the case of an innocent man being
hanged for the murder of his wife, in Rillington Place.
The real murderer was John Christie.

No, let's have no more judicial hangings. Sharia law
has no place among civilised people.

Don't worry, Parkhurst for life is not the most pleasant
way to die slowly.

81 to 100 of 116rss feed

First Previous 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Death penalty for Steve Wright

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.