oneeyedvic, sorry if I caused you offence. That really wasn't my intention at all. I know your question was NOT directly comparing the two, and I see from your answers that you are by no means an extremist of any sort, so I do apologise for this. However, I do react strongly when the hunting and aninmal testing debates are discussed togther. You're right, I AM pro testing. Testing is a legal requirement in most developed countries in teh world. it is required so that all medicines are known to be effective and safe. it helps prevents things like thalidomide surfacing again, and provides vital safety information to the medical profession (ie how much damage would an overdose of X-drug do, if taken by accident by a child?).
Personally, I know too many people who go to work every day and worry abotu what they'll face. People who have to actually check under their cars for bombs or fireworks, people who are threatened, sometimes daily, just for going about thier legal work. these people work in animal testing. The hunting debate is an entirely separate thign for most people, but to animal liberations groups and extremists, it is sadly OFTEN grouped together as one cause...as a lot of their literature will verify.
Sorry again if I was rude, or not clear enough, but I do stand by what I said. x