Grace Dent To Replace Gregg Wallace On...
Film, Media & TV4 mins ago
so they get suspended from the bbc
who is running this country ?
political correctness gone mad ?
the press whip up a frenzy about some childish prank and even the pm has nothing better to do than have his twopenn'orth
so why did we all need to know ?
yet if some one goes on live tv and threatens to kill maim and injure then nothing more is said !!!
if the press have that much power then perhaps they should start to address some of the more emotional issues , such as lenient court sentencing !!
political correctness gone mad ?
the press whip up a frenzy about some childish prank and even the pm has nothing better to do than have his twopenn'orth
so why did we all need to know ?
yet if some one goes on live tv and threatens to kill maim and injure then nothing more is said !!!
if the press have that much power then perhaps they should start to address some of the more emotional issues , such as lenient court sentencing !!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by johnny.5. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
They did not commit a crime - but they abused their position and denegrated and upset a person who is held in affection by a lot of people. They overstepped the mark. In any case, as a past fan of Ross, I have found him increasingly boring over the past 12 months or so and will certainly not miss him. If I was as incompetent at my job as these two were I would have been dismissed. Time for a change on Saturday mornings.
I didn't think I would ever say this, but my opinion of Russell Brand has altered, somewhat for the better.
He has 'bit the bullet', made a full apology and much to my admiration has resigned from the BBC.
Whereas that slithering, self-opinionated, excuse for an entertainer, Jonathan Ross has chosen to hide away like the coward he is, and not to resign from his lucrative job at the BBC.
He has 'bit the bullet', made a full apology and much to my admiration has resigned from the BBC.
Whereas that slithering, self-opinionated, excuse for an entertainer, Jonathan Ross has chosen to hide away like the coward he is, and not to resign from his lucrative job at the BBC.
sp1814
Would anyone like to take bets on whether this will top the number of complaints made to CH4 over the 'Big Brother racism row'?
Actually, it's telling how the people who are up in arms about this incident had no issue over that one.
sp1814
Can you explain what thought process led you to play the race card on your post???
Interesting...
Would anyone like to take bets on whether this will top the number of complaints made to CH4 over the 'Big Brother racism row'?
Actually, it's telling how the people who are up in arms about this incident had no issue over that one.
sp1814
Can you explain what thought process led you to play the race card on your post???
Interesting...
AOG
Sorry, but that won't work.
You have two stories which have common elements:
1. Broadcast programmes which include unprovoked distateful comments about someone.
2. Public outcry
3. Blanket newspaper coverage.
4. Comments from Government ministers
5. Resignation/sacking
6. Public enquiry
7. Deluge of complaints in the thousands.
Are you seriously saying that someone wouldn't make a comparison between the two cases?
The only difference is that it's the dailymailers who are up in arms whereas before, they thought the non-dailymailers were over-reacting.
See!
Sorry, but that won't work.
You have two stories which have common elements:
1. Broadcast programmes which include unprovoked distateful comments about someone.
2. Public outcry
3. Blanket newspaper coverage.
4. Comments from Government ministers
5. Resignation/sacking
6. Public enquiry
7. Deluge of complaints in the thousands.
Are you seriously saying that someone wouldn't make a comparison between the two cases?
The only difference is that it's the dailymailers who are up in arms whereas before, they thought the non-dailymailers were over-reacting.
See!
eltelioni
how many of these people actually listened to the show and complained? I'll bet you my months wages none! Why cos there was only 2 complaints made after the show. 8 DAYS, yes 8 DAYS after it was broadcast and the Mail decide to run a huge campaign, sorry story on it, people start complaining and a media witch hunt begins.
I am not defending what they did because it was obviously foolish and misguided but the thread question is about the media and the media are creating a feeding frenzy and hype so they have something to sell.
how many of these people actually listened to the show and complained? I'll bet you my months wages none! Why cos there was only 2 complaints made after the show. 8 DAYS, yes 8 DAYS after it was broadcast and the Mail decide to run a huge campaign, sorry story on it, people start complaining and a media witch hunt begins.
I am not defending what they did because it was obviously foolish and misguided but the thread question is about the media and the media are creating a feeding frenzy and hype so they have something to sell.
If I was Mr Sachs I'd be telling the media in no uncertain terms to f**k right off and stop being so patronising. When I get to the age of 78, if anyone thinks that I can't handle someone using a swear word in my direction, then I'll knifecrime them with my walking stick. Why does everyone think that elderly people should be treated like simple children? It's nothing short of embarrassing.
Have you ever wondered why the shows over past 30 odd years that are constantly repeated are the ones that didn't use porn, sex and violence . Many were not politically correct but they limited their remarks to other actors within the show , they didn't attack or humiliate specific people who in many cases are unable to hit back. Today these cowards know that even if they are punished , which is seldom, they will be welcomed back as soon as the fuss dies down. A bit like our politicians. It has been my experience that they good at dishing it out but can't take it when they receive similar treatment.
Supernick
You've hit on something that crossed my mind the other day.
When I'm 78 years old, I'll be pretty much the same person I am now, but with saggier jowls and a penchant for 'Antiques Roadshow' (which I admit, I already watch regularly).
I absolutely believe that senior citizens should be treated with respect, and personally, I moderate my language when I'm in the company of someone over, say, 60.
However, this story shows that parts of the media are definitely (if not consciously) 'cotton woolling' the elderly, which is bordering on patronisation.
You've hit on something that crossed my mind the other day.
When I'm 78 years old, I'll be pretty much the same person I am now, but with saggier jowls and a penchant for 'Antiques Roadshow' (which I admit, I already watch regularly).
I absolutely believe that senior citizens should be treated with respect, and personally, I moderate my language when I'm in the company of someone over, say, 60.
However, this story shows that parts of the media are definitely (if not consciously) 'cotton woolling' the elderly, which is bordering on patronisation.
johnny.5 tell you what, give out the home number of one of your elderly relatives and let us have a time when you know they are out and their answerphone is on.
One of us will phone them and say we had sex with one of their relatives, used a condom, laugh a lot, take the mickey out of them, keep phoning back, make jokes about them, apologise whilst singing, but at the same time insulting them and laughing.
I bet you will be laughing won't you when your distraught elderly relative then tells you what happened.
You mention lenient court sentencing. If the BBC hadn't been so lenient in the first place over what it allows onto the airwaves, it wouldn't have happened in the first place.
Interestingly, I saw Graham Norton was up to his old tricks tonight making prank calls on his show. One for you media people to pick up on me thinks.
One of us will phone them and say we had sex with one of their relatives, used a condom, laugh a lot, take the mickey out of them, keep phoning back, make jokes about them, apologise whilst singing, but at the same time insulting them and laughing.
I bet you will be laughing won't you when your distraught elderly relative then tells you what happened.
You mention lenient court sentencing. If the BBC hadn't been so lenient in the first place over what it allows onto the airwaves, it wouldn't have happened in the first place.
Interestingly, I saw Graham Norton was up to his old tricks tonight making prank calls on his show. One for you media people to pick up on me thinks.
