ChatterBank6 mins ago
What is going on.....http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7838298.stm
19 Answers
read the story and then try and convince me these examples of human garbage have recieved a sufficient punishment
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7838 298.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7838 298.stm
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by bazwillrun. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Well I'm pretty liberal as you know but I was somewhat surprised when I heard this.
5 years is meant to be the starting point for rape
I do note that the one that got 6 years was not charged with rape and the one that got 8 years was not charged with GBH.
This leaves us with the 9 year sentence - I'd imagine that thelogic was 5 years for the rape and 4 for the GBH
Personally I'd have thought that something nearer 15 in total would have been nearer the mark and probably would have been if he hadn't been under 18 at the time he committed the offence
5 years is meant to be the starting point for rape
I do note that the one that got 6 years was not charged with rape and the one that got 8 years was not charged with GBH.
This leaves us with the 9 year sentence - I'd imagine that thelogic was 5 years for the rape and 4 for the GBH
Personally I'd have thought that something nearer 15 in total would have been nearer the mark and probably would have been if he hadn't been under 18 at the time he committed the offence
By some degree, this was the nastiest crime story of 2008. I'm with J-T-P on this. The sentences (especially considering reductions for good behaviour) seem shockingly lenient.
...and I would've thought an accomodation for the severity of the attack, the number of attackers and the fact that the girl had learning difficulties would've borne out stiffer sentences.
When I read the story, my immediate thought would be that 15-18 years would've been apropriate for the crime.
...and I would've thought an accomodation for the severity of the attack, the number of attackers and the fact that the girl had learning difficulties would've borne out stiffer sentences.
When I read the story, my immediate thought would be that 15-18 years would've been apropriate for the crime.
Where were you all when I originally posted this case or cases to be exact, there were 2 such cases.
http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/News/Question66 9521.html
I was hounded and still are to this day for daring to call these scum, savages.
Simply because they were Black it appears that 'savages' is another no word, no matter what despicable crimes they have committed.
http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/News/Question66 9521.html
I was hounded and still are to this day for daring to call these scum, savages.
Simply because they were Black it appears that 'savages' is another no word, no matter what despicable crimes they have committed.
I think we were waiting for the jury verdict AOG
You on the other hand didn't seem to think that such a formality was necessary and the whole thread went off on one of those nasty little racist angles.
Don't let us stop you from giving us your view on how race has affected this case though
http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/News/Question69 3955.html
Or do you just comment when the offenders are black?
You on the other hand didn't seem to think that such a formality was necessary and the whole thread went off on one of those nasty little racist angles.
Don't let us stop you from giving us your view on how race has affected this case though
http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/News/Question69 3955.html
Or do you just comment when the offenders are black?
I think we were waiting for the jury verdict AOG
If you had read the news reports Jake you would have found that they had already been found guilty but were awaiting sentencing.
But why not bend the facts a little, if you want to have a dig at me, after all that is what you are constantly accusing the Daily Mail of doing.
If you had read the news reports Jake you would have found that they had already been found guilty but were awaiting sentencing.
But why not bend the facts a little, if you want to have a dig at me, after all that is what you are constantly accusing the Daily Mail of doing.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.