Film, Media & TV52 mins ago
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by becks. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I disagree
Why should animals pay with their life just because humans get involved in their life and go into their territory?!
If another human had killed that man then the murder wouldnt die....he'd get sent to prision for a life sentence but after about 10 years he'd be released....free to carry on with his life.
I think shooting the stag was correct, because it may have killed more people. Its not a punishment like the death penalty, I know the animal was only doing what comes naturally. I also think that say if an elephant, for instance killed its mahout, that it should be shot too- so that it will not go on to kill more people.
I am against killing an animal for sport. Killing animals for food has been there for centuries and I don't dispute it, but I think more painless and quick ways should be devised.
its symptomatic of a general condition which I believe is harmful to people. the more you pander to people's stupid ideas the more stupid ides they get.
note for people - do not project human characteristics onto animals, because you will merely be taking yourself another step into a delightful little dream world. I am beyond belief at the stupidity and naeivity of most people really.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.