take a look at this news artical

[suna]

what your view i think it is a great mistake
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/18/20090324/tod-ryana ir-chief-defends-on-board-toile-7f81b96.html

[krazydiamond]

�10 for a seat or bring your own Orange box






Ta Toot Ta Taarrooooooot

[VHG]

Spelling "article" as "artical" is also another great mistake.

[suna]

then thanks for pointing this out

[krazydiamond]

VHG wanted cb to charge people �1 for every spellink mistake







I would be skint






Ta Toot Ta Tarroooooot

[suna]

well that's 2 you have made now

[bundleone]

people won't buy drinks on-board, as they will need to keep weeing

[Totterdown]

Why do some people think it necessary to point out spelling mistakes? It is condescending. We all know what is meant without some people being big headed about it.

[Ice.Maiden]

People just won't drink so much, so they'll lose out anyway.

[CrazyCathy]

But I love the idea of the guy's picture on the toilet paper.

Also be good to just put �1 in and hold the door open for the next person ......

Crazy idea

[Eve]

What about people with IBS or other medical problems meaning they need to use the toilet facilities sometimes at very short notice including having to change pads or underwear or similar.

Or those who get very travel sick or have young children who need changing.

Also for poor people who don't know and don't have the right change on them. Wondering what their longest non-stop flight is.

[Ice.Maiden]

Or just those who sit there, determined to get their �1's worth.........

[Postdog]

Simple answer, don't fly with them. They're just taking the pi55. (well, sort of anyway!)

And there aree worse things than spelling mistakes - current post in law has no punctuation whatsoever and is very hard to make sense of.

[mushroom25]

the public want to be able to fly for peanuts, and charging for stuff that you might not actually need is one way of keeping the headline cost down, eg checked baggage, airport check-in, and now toilets.

Ryanair are upfront about it, and you have a choice. If you don't like their business tactics, fly with someone else. but if you can put up with the little inconveniences (like landing at an airport that's actually nowhere near where you think you're going), there's probably few more economical ways of flying.

[oldhamfan]

Yeah but if you have forked out for a drink the least they can do is throw in a free slash!

[mushroom25]

I s'pose you could make a point by p00ing in a sick bag and handing it to the cabin crew - but I doubt that would win you many friends.

[gilf]

While I agree to some extent mushroom25, the point is there is minimal cost implications for toilet use.

With baggage there is an increase in the required fuel consumption. With manual check in there needs to be a person (or more people) employed and so on.

With regards to the toilet, it's there whether it's being used or not, it costs the same to clean if 1 or 101 people use it on a flight.

But I do agree, if you don't like it don't fly with Ryanair, simple.

[B00]

Lovely comment...

"We will charge for every possible thing we can think to charge for,

Nice to know they're putting their customers 1st then!