Motoring11 mins ago
Common courtesy, political correctness and the return of Carol Thatcher
Carol Thatcher is back in the news. She was interviewed on BBC One's Andrew Marr Show over the weekend and said she has no regrets for referring to a black tennis player as a 'wolligog' (you know what I mean - don't want AB's censor to get me!).
She states "I used it in a context which wasn't actually appreciated at the time."
To a certain extent, she should be applauded for sticking to her guns, despite the obvious financial costs she has incurred (loss of earnings etc). And as she says, she's had thousands of letters of support, so she's not alone in thinking that her language shouldn't cause offence...
But what she says now raises an interesting question - exactly what circumstances would it be appropriate to refer to a black person as a wolligog?
How and where would this epithet be appropriate?
Would it be okay when there are no black people to hear it?
Is it like a tree falling over in the woods? If no black person is around to hear something offensive, then it's not offensive?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/80068 38.stm
She states "I used it in a context which wasn't actually appreciated at the time."
To a certain extent, she should be applauded for sticking to her guns, despite the obvious financial costs she has incurred (loss of earnings etc). And as she says, she's had thousands of letters of support, so she's not alone in thinking that her language shouldn't cause offence...
But what she says now raises an interesting question - exactly what circumstances would it be appropriate to refer to a black person as a wolligog?
How and where would this epithet be appropriate?
Would it be okay when there are no black people to hear it?
Is it like a tree falling over in the woods? If no black person is around to hear something offensive, then it's not offensive?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/80068 38.stm
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sp1814. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Well whether we like it or not a wolligog DOES exist as an image or character (I remember getting wolligog badges from jam when I was a kid).
So if a person LOOKS like that image or character is it wrong to say so?
She is not saying the black person IS a wolligog, only that he looks like one.
It is like saying Peter Crouch (the lanky footballer) looks like a lampost or something like that.
It could be said that one of the players who played for Everton yesterday, Fellaini, looks a bit like one (and I am not sure he is even black or half caste) so that cannot be racist.
http://www.evertonfc.com/assets/_files/images/ mar_09/efc__1236533503_Fellaini-celebrate-450. jpg
So if a person LOOKS like that image or character is it wrong to say so?
She is not saying the black person IS a wolligog, only that he looks like one.
It is like saying Peter Crouch (the lanky footballer) looks like a lampost or something like that.
It could be said that one of the players who played for Everton yesterday, Fellaini, looks a bit like one (and I am not sure he is even black or half caste) so that cannot be racist.
http://www.evertonfc.com/assets/_files/images/ mar_09/efc__1236533503_Fellaini-celebrate-450. jpg
VHG
I understand where you're coming from...but the weird thing is she was referring to Jo-Wilfried Tsonga...and he doesn't look anything like a golliwog:
http://www.australianopen.com/en_AU/news/artic les/2008-01-26/200801261201318695343.html
He just looks like a rather good-looking young man.
I don't get the connection?
I understand where you're coming from...but the weird thing is she was referring to Jo-Wilfried Tsonga...and he doesn't look anything like a golliwog:
http://www.australianopen.com/en_AU/news/artic les/2008-01-26/200801261201318695343.html
He just looks like a rather good-looking young man.
I don't get the connection?
Your last remark almost leads me to believe you had been listening to James Allen on LBC, jake.
Unfortunately, sp, since the ludicrous MacPherson report into the death of Stephen Lawrencethe the �tree falling over in the woods� approach will no longer work. That preposterous report absurdly decreed (among many other absurdities which took it far beyond its remit) that an incident is declared racist if it is �perceived to be racist by the victim or any other person [my italics].
This means that if an incident such as that you describe occurs, then anybody, whether they heard it first hand or not, or whether they were offended by it then or subsequently (or not at all) can describe it as racist. Then the full panoply of the race relations industry comes into play and, concurrently, common sense is thrown out of the window.
The term used by Ms Thatcher is appropriate when used to describe a child�s toy (though, of course, even this is considered offensive because many consider the toys themselves offensive). I do not consider it appropriate to use it to describe a black person and it is not something that I would do. However, we all have different ways of expressing ourselves. I don�t particularly like being referred to as �white trash�. I have been so described on occasions, but I got over it (quite quickly as it happens) without having to seek succour through the media or the courts.
Unfortunately, sp, since the ludicrous MacPherson report into the death of Stephen Lawrencethe the �tree falling over in the woods� approach will no longer work. That preposterous report absurdly decreed (among many other absurdities which took it far beyond its remit) that an incident is declared racist if it is �perceived to be racist by the victim or any other person [my italics].
This means that if an incident such as that you describe occurs, then anybody, whether they heard it first hand or not, or whether they were offended by it then or subsequently (or not at all) can describe it as racist. Then the full panoply of the race relations industry comes into play and, concurrently, common sense is thrown out of the window.
The term used by Ms Thatcher is appropriate when used to describe a child�s toy (though, of course, even this is considered offensive because many consider the toys themselves offensive). I do not consider it appropriate to use it to describe a black person and it is not something that I would do. However, we all have different ways of expressing ourselves. I don�t particularly like being referred to as �white trash�. I have been so described on occasions, but I got over it (quite quickly as it happens) without having to seek succour through the media or the courts.
-- answer removed --
Let's not p1ss about here .
Her use of the word was meant to be derogatory - she was not using the word in context of a doll that little johnny , cuddles up to at night .
In any event why should anyone pay much attention to her -she is only in the public eye for being the daughter of a Former PM ,and not a good one at that .
Her use of the word was meant to be derogatory - she was not using the word in context of a doll that little johnny , cuddles up to at night .
In any event why should anyone pay much attention to her -she is only in the public eye for being the daughter of a Former PM ,and not a good one at that .
-- answer removed --
New Judge
You raise an interesting point there...if someone regards an incident or statement as racist, prior to the MacPherson report, they would not be able to complain about it?
I'm actually quite surprised about that. I mean, I know white people who are vehemently anti-racist and get offended when they hear racist comments.
I wondered why they got so riled, and a mate put it like this:
If I'm in a cab and the driver says something racist, he offends me personally, because he's assuming I'm like him...that I'm 'in that club'
I 'spose people like my mate need to feel that they have recourse to complain as does anyone.
But back to my original question...is there a context in which Ms Thatcher could've reasonably used the word to describe a black person?
I ask this because she states that she said it in a context where it wasn't appreciated.
So in which context would it be appreciated???
You raise an interesting point there...if someone regards an incident or statement as racist, prior to the MacPherson report, they would not be able to complain about it?
I'm actually quite surprised about that. I mean, I know white people who are vehemently anti-racist and get offended when they hear racist comments.
I wondered why they got so riled, and a mate put it like this:
If I'm in a cab and the driver says something racist, he offends me personally, because he's assuming I'm like him...that I'm 'in that club'
I 'spose people like my mate need to feel that they have recourse to complain as does anyone.
But back to my original question...is there a context in which Ms Thatcher could've reasonably used the word to describe a black person?
I ask this because she states that she said it in a context where it wasn't appreciated.
So in which context would it be appreciated???
I'm afraid I'm someway out of the LBC transmission area NJ - so I have absolutely no idea who James Allen is or why that would be relevent.
All the rubbish about the word's original meaning is totally disinguous Berti's exactly right it was clearly meant in a derogatory manner
If I called someone on here a donkey or a pig and then tried to wriggle out of it by saying that the word just meant a mammal it could scarcely be more ridiculous
All the rubbish about the word's original meaning is totally disinguous Berti's exactly right it was clearly meant in a derogatory manner
If I called someone on here a donkey or a pig and then tried to wriggle out of it by saying that the word just meant a mammal it could scarcely be more ridiculous
Nice attempt, VHG. But you know it's bullsh*t.
She wasn't pointing out that he looks like a golliwog. She was saying he was one (knowing the racial baggage the term carries - she's not that thick) and that it was therefore a good thing that he was defeated.
Not exactly a dispassionate discussion of his physical appearance.
She wasn't pointing out that he looks like a golliwog. She was saying he was one (knowing the racial baggage the term carries - she's not that thick) and that it was therefore a good thing that he was defeated.
Not exactly a dispassionate discussion of his physical appearance.
A fundamental question - why do Black people get called horrible things?
Just like her f----- mother a horriblr pompus t--- who dismisses everybody else as being beneath her.
Put her to the stake, or in this case, in the pot
It would appear that white people also get called horrible things.
It seems it is alright to put certain people to the stake or even in the pot. But woe betide anyone who calls a Black person a Wolligog.
Just like her f----- mother a horriblr pompus t--- who dismisses everybody else as being beneath her.
Put her to the stake, or in this case, in the pot
It would appear that white people also get called horrible things.
It seems it is alright to put certain people to the stake or even in the pot. But woe betide anyone who calls a Black person a Wolligog.
Latest Posts
Film, Media & TV17 mins ago
ChatterBank18 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles22 mins ago
Well At Least Sir Kier Is Topping One...
News25 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.