Hell Hath no fury......

[R1Geezer]

.....like a bunch of lefty bigots scorned!
According to The British Adoption society, if you do not agree with gay adoption you are a "retarded homophobe"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-118138 0/Slurred-adoption-Nazis-Critics-gay-parenting -branded-retarded-homophobes.html
Is this every bit as bigotted as the normal opinions that are branded as such?

[naomi24]

Sp, you really don�t read what others say, do you? You contributed to the discussion on this subject on the other thread, as did I, but it seems that everything I said went completely over your head. Never mind. �To clarify�, I�ll copy some of it here.

If it's a choice between two loving parents of the same sex, and a life in care, I know which I'd choose.

And �.

�.Surely rather than commit a child to various foster homes, shoving it from pillar to post, or abandoning it to a children's home until it's 17 when it then faces the world alone in some bedsit somewhere, it's preferable for it to be part of a family unit and raised by two people who will love it?

And �.

Whether children are with their natural parents, with one natural parent, with aunts, uncles, grandparents, or with adoptive parents, same sex or otherwise, they need a loving, stable, home - it's as simple as that - and if we can provide it, then we should.

I never said that gay adoption goes against common sense, and I think the above would indicate that gay adoption doesn�t �bother� me. You�ve unwittingly proven my point that those who think they're �progressive� don�t actually take the trouble to �think� before applying the �phobic� label. Your reaction has, in fact, provided a perfect example of exactly what I was talking about . Thank you for illustrating it so clearly. I rest my case.