No Justice!!!

[chinadog]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-118562 3/Fury-Baby-P-sentences-mother-walk-free-jail- just-years.html

[Jillius]

Words fail me. When she is released she will probably be given a new identity and a house at the tax payers expense. They should let her rot in hell.

[Twinkle17]

I am so saddened by this whole story but I am not shocked at all by the sentences they have been given, as it again goes to show that the British so-called "Justice" system is a complete joke.

Kill a child = get a better life for yourself.

So sad.

Bless him. x

[chinadog]

Words fail me too Jillius. Maybe it was the "heart rendering "letter she wrote to the judge. Im disgusted!

[barry1010]

She has been jailed indefinitely. It will be a very long time before she is released.

[craft1948]

She'd have got longer for torturing and killing a dog....

[chinadog]

She should'nt be released ever Barry but like Twinkle says " Kill a child,get a life".

[Twinkle17]

I cant understand why the stepfathers sentence for killing Baby Peter will run concurrently with his sentence for raping the other child. Why??? Not only are they given sickeningly short sentences, he doesnt even actually have to serve each one seperately.

Both of the children in this case have received life sentences in one way or another, through no fault of their own, yet the people who did it to them, the people who are to blame, get this. Absolutely pathetic.

[paraffin]

All 3 were sentenced under a new offence for which the maximum sentence is only 14 years.

The biggest problem for the prosecution is trying to prove any given offence, and any of you who has ever had any experience of this will know exactly what I mean. It's the system which is at fault (as about 100 MPs have been saying for the past couple of weeks in a different type of scandal.)

[susiespider]

Does anyone know why these people are still not being named? I don't understand why they are still officially anonymous (though I know it's easy enough to find their names from Google). Is there a good reason?

[caththecrazy]

Even after the boy was put under a child protection plan, his case was regarded as routine 'with injuries expected as a matter of course'.

What on earth does that mean? They expect a child to have injuries - well why didn't they take him away. That is unacceptable to leave a child or anyone in the care of someone and say injuries are expected.

Think they should have done to them what they did to that poor little baby. There are no words to describe the way I feel about these beings - I can't called them human as they aren't and no animal would do this to their young.

[rov1200]

I believe they never established who did the injuries but from what I gather it was the boyfriend not the Mother who went out of her way to protect the scum. I assume it was the mother who took the child to be treated and it beggars belief why she kept with him.

[ELVIS68]

Sentences should also be handed out to the Haringey Council workers who failed to protect this poor child

This is the same Council who failed in the Victoria Climbie case a few years back

[MrsBobbins]

I sincerely hope that these three scumbags never know another moments peace for the rest of their miserable lives (which with a bit of luck won't be for much longer) and have to sleep with one eye open. All three should be sterilised so there is no possibility of any of them reproducing in the future. Hopefully some kind inmates will do the whole world a favour and wipe the lot of them off the face of the planet. I would quite gladly do the job, hell I'd even enjoy it.