Editor's Blog2 mins ago
Are there too many words?
The English Language is about to get its 1,000.000th word.
The average person uses less than 14,000 words. That leaves a lot of redundant words.
French and German have about a 10th of what we have.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/culturenews /5493366/One-millionth-English-word-to-be-unve iled.html
Should we have a purge and ban anymore stupid words like 'noob' or 'chiconomics'?
The average person uses less than 14,000 words. That leaves a lot of redundant words.
French and German have about a 10th of what we have.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/culturenews /5493366/One-millionth-English-word-to-be-unve iled.html
Should we have a purge and ban anymore stupid words like 'noob' or 'chiconomics'?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
I don't understand some of the ideas presented here. We should all positively revel in the wonderful abundance of our glorious language rather than fault it!
And as for spelling simplification...absurd! Doing any such thing would lose the whole history, background and etymology of many words. For example, spelling a sailing-boat as yot rather than yacht would break all connection with its source in the Dutch word, jacht. Complete dumbing-down!
Leave it alone and welcome every new word that comes along; you don't have to use the ones you don't like.
And as for spelling simplification...absurd! Doing any such thing would lose the whole history, background and etymology of many words. For example, spelling a sailing-boat as yot rather than yacht would break all connection with its source in the Dutch word, jacht. Complete dumbing-down!
Leave it alone and welcome every new word that comes along; you don't have to use the ones you don't like.
Quizmonster
i totally agree. I was playing devil's advocate with the question.
For a start it would be impossible to ban any words, and for a strong and vibrant living language, the more words the better.
Rather that than try to impose the protectionism on the language like the French. I even rather like the stupid words like noob as well.
R1Geezer
You must be a slow learner. The English language no longer belongs to the English or England.
i totally agree. I was playing devil's advocate with the question.
For a start it would be impossible to ban any words, and for a strong and vibrant living language, the more words the better.
Rather that than try to impose the protectionism on the language like the French. I even rather like the stupid words like noob as well.
R1Geezer
You must be a slow learner. The English language no longer belongs to the English or England.
-- answer removed --
Dr. Samuel Johnson: [places two manuscripts on the table, but picks up the top one] Here it is, sir. The very cornerstone of English scholarship. This book, sir, contains every word in our beloved language.
Blackadder: Every single one, sir?
Dr. Samuel Johnson: Every single word, sir!
Blackadder: Oh, well, in that case, sir, I hope you will not object if I also offer the Doctor my most enthusiastic contrafribularities.
Dr. Samuel Johnson: What?
Blackadder: "Contrafribularites", sir? It is a common word down our way.
Dr. Samuel Johnson: Damn! [writes in the book]
Blackadder: Oh, I'm sorry, sir. I'm anispeptic, frasmotic, even compunctuous to have caused you such pericombobulation.
Blackadder: Every single one, sir?
Dr. Samuel Johnson: Every single word, sir!
Blackadder: Oh, well, in that case, sir, I hope you will not object if I also offer the Doctor my most enthusiastic contrafribularities.
Dr. Samuel Johnson: What?
Blackadder: "Contrafribularites", sir? It is a common word down our way.
Dr. Samuel Johnson: Damn! [writes in the book]
Blackadder: Oh, I'm sorry, sir. I'm anispeptic, frasmotic, even compunctuous to have caused you such pericombobulation.